TriZ Series (Level of Invention)

The level of invention

Problem angle	1th level	2nd level	3rd level	4th level	5th level
Original condition	Specific task with only one parameter	Tasks that have multiple parameters; Have a similar structure	A "pile of tasks" with poor structure; There are only functional similarities.	Many factors are unknown; There is no similarity in structure or function	The main target is unknown; There are no similar
Resources and problem-solving people	resources are clearly accessible; Mastery through basic professional training	Resources are not easy to find, but still exist in the system; Through the traditional professional training can be mastered;	Resources are often derived from other systems and levels, and the need for a combination of ideas	Resources come from different areas of knowledge; Need to have strong associative thinking, broad knowledge and ability to serve the mindset of the visitor	Resources or their applications were previously unknown; motives of choice, no thinking
Difficulty level	No conflict between targets	Standard questions	Non-standard issues	The extreme problem	A unique problem
Conversion rules	Using technology optimization as a solution	A technical solution based on typical analogy	To obtain the solution of invention by combination method	To obtain solutions to inventions through the integration of technical effects	Science and technology Inventions
Innovation level	Slight changes in feature parameters	The basic functional and structural solutions have not changed within the functional principle	A meaningful invention with a positive effect, a change in functional principle	Shocking inventions with super-efficient systems, resulting in an essential change in neighboring systems	A brilliant invention with a super system that makes civilization change in nature

This level of invention only summarizes the difficulty of the invention, and there is no good or bad points, innovation and invention must be rooted in the soil, there is no predecessor of the foreshadowing, is 100 Einstein can not find the mass energy equation. The purpose of summing up the level of the invention is in order to better carry out the invention, through the evaluation system, subsystem, the level of the hyper-system, to spiral to enhance the system hierarchy. Another system hierarchy division is not absolute, because this level is qualitative, not quantitative, moreover, the simple system is generally very few, its subsystems or super systems are likely to be at different levels, which is what I said, through this system-level analysis, you can spiral to improve the system's reasons.

In the preceding also said, the TriZ invention theory is not omnipotent, TriZ invention theory for 1-level and 5-class invention is basically ineffective, TRIZ is more suitable for the 2-4-class invention, especially 3-4 two class. But this is also where the invention is relatively concentrated, so the effectiveness of TRIZ innovation theory is also in this. Unlike other innovative methods, such as synthesis, combinatorial, brainstorming, the advantages of TriZ lie in its operability and ease of convergence. Thus reducing the threshold for innovative inventions. Of course, in the algorithmic steps of innovative inventions, other innovative methods can also be used as an auxiliary method to join them.

The core problem of innovation and invention is how to rule out the disturbance of the thinking pattern and the aimless thinking divergence.

TriZ Series (Level of Invention)