We also talked about "overtime ".

Today, there are many posts about overtime in the garden, causing a lot of controversy:

Http://www.cnblogs.com/realdigit/archive/2011/03/06/1972242.html

Http://www.cnblogs.com/jyk/archive/2011/03/07/1973214.html

 

I think:

 

First, it is not overtime to study and entertain yourself in the company.

 

In addition to this situation, overtime can be divided into "active overtime" and "passive overtime ":

 

Active overtime: for jobs that have been completed at work, you must overfulfill them and keep improving. This kind of overtime work is purely personal enthusiasm and is very good. It is common in the company's management staff, some bosses, and employees who work actively and well. Employees who actively work overtime are bosses who like employees who take the initiative to work overtime (such as Tang Jun) as you can see, you will naturally get a certain amount of work.

 

Passive overtime: working overtime such as catching up on projects and getting online is a kind of "incompetent and wrong" (not derogatory). However, most of these failures or mistakes are paid by technicians, it can be divided:

 

1. the project manager is incompetent or wrong (due to poor schedule, resulting in forced overtime) 2. failure or error of sales/planning personnel (commitment that the customer's time cannot be coordinated with the development team) 3. management Staff's incompetence or errors (the boss does not actually require employees to work overtime) 4. technical staff are incompetent or wrong (unable to play assigned tasks, of course, they have to work overtime)

 

In principle, the company should pay the overtime pay for the first three passive overtime; and the 4th passive overtime pay is a problem of the technicians themselves. The company should not pay the overtime pay, in some cases, technical personnel's capabilities may need to be challenged.

 

Therefore, the "Glorious" concept of overtime is too one-sided. Everyone is an adult, and it is necessary to analyze the problem in a dialectical manner.