What is Edu2.0 in your mind?

(Note: The content is reprinted from: Edu 2.0 google group. You need to invite me to read the content. I am worried that the wonderful content will be buried, so I will post it here .)

Zhyujiang: Edu2.0 has two types of understanding: 1. It applies web2.0 to education and promotes development of education. 2. Use the concept and connotation of web2.0 to transform existing education.

Isaac Mao: Edu 2.0 is still an expectation, with the actual Edu 1.0
There has been a great deal of progress, and we believe that people here are already on their way to 2.0. Because many people become practitioners of Learning 2.0, they have the opportunity to give birth to Edu.
2.0. Learning has more active roles than Education.
I think Edu 2.0 has the following features:

0. Technology/tool: Bring the toolbox of Web 2.0, and network and social software are part of people. They are personal media and platforms for collaboration. Everyone's "social recognition" has begun to improve, and can be instantly global. Technology makes learning no longer expensive, Edu
1.0 the natural connection with money is broken.

1. Sharing: Sharism)
The individual replaces the knowledge workers forced to share, the teaching work has become a by-product, the micro-content creation and collaboration activities have become the basic actions launched at any time, distribution at any time, and the right to return to the individual.

2. Decentralization: many heroes are shared)
The horizontal connection will lead to the birth of a flat reform in the education system. The school is only one of the venues for activities, and the management system of vertical and downward education will also collapse ?), Active social activities in education are replaced by centers. Learn to become a "many-to-many" network.

3. Diversity: knowledge has finally become the building of an individual. Each learner has the right to choose and publicize his/her knowledge. At the same time, he/she is able to evolve in the filtering of social nature, so as to generate respect and symbiosis.

4.
Trust: people begin to accumulate their learning capital (a social capital) and pay attention to their lifelong trust system, improve your ability to evaluate information (Do you trust people's daily or the facts described by 20 people around you ?) "Information + trust = knowledge"
It may be a new consensus formula.

I think there are many other features from Web 2.0, Democracy 2.0, and Life 2. 0...
The ultimate goal is to maximize mental usage and coordinate with technology, plus happiness.

An interview with the magazine information technology education has been published for your reference. I will also invite Yang Yu, the interviewer, to join the discussion.

Web2.0and Educational Information, 2.doc 89 K download

Qiwsir: EDU2.0 and WEB2.0 should not be mixed. The former is the relationship between people and people; the latter is the relationship between people and technology.
It is true that there are many traces of WEB in EDU2.O.
In my opinion, no matter how the development of education changes, it is always carried out around learning activities.
The current lack of education, or the revolution that technology brings to education, often ignores this truth intentionally or unintentionally.
Technology has developed, but how to apply and who to apply is a key issue.
Education is a relatively closed system. In this system, it is impossible to be completely consistent with the real society. This is why many people outside of Education complain that education is out of their practical willingness.
The actual education is to pass on human knowledge. Only abstract things can be passed on for a long time. Imagine if we are teaching Newton's Law to students today, is it okay to study like that in the Newton age? Therefore, education must be separated from reality, and for some knowledge, there may be more. For example, mathematics.
At present, education emphasizes the connection with life, and often ignores the unique laws of the inheritance of knowledge.
In this sense, the idea of WEB2.O is very limited in education. For example, if Mr. Mao says that words are not centered, he cannot go to the center in education. Because of the inheritance of knowledge, the learner must go through the process of learning. At this time, the role of the teacher cannot be ignored, from a micro perspective, it may emphasize inspiration and guidance, but from a macro perspective, teaching is still the main component. Without teaching, it is difficult for students to accept knowledge like Newton's law of motion, not to mention calculus and other mathematical knowledge.
In addition, I have noticed that many of what Mr. Mao says in his article is limited to learning in a free state. However, in terms of the real learning process of students, many of the learning still happens in the classroom. In the classroom, whether BLOG/WIKI or web2.0 are today, their shortcomings are met: it is impossible for students to do more with their own work, and they cannot really explore. These tools are more focused on reading information. Especially for mathematics and science education, it can only be used as a way to present data. It is not shown much difference than the so-called WEB1.0.
In summary, I think the reference to edu2.0 is not very rigorous.

Isaac Mao: Good thinking and points of view. Everyone can come to the discussion to make progress in understanding.

Several issues that can facilitate further debate:
1. we should not put ourselves in shackles and make some agreements to discuss this issue. For example, "Education is a relatively closed system ", this is similar to saying that "China was a closed system before 1980s.
2. "A lot of learning happens in the classroom" is another agreed framework. However, most of the current education happens in the classroom, so we do not have to remove the classroom. A classroom is a place and should be used better. Many knowledge and education activities take place outside the classroom, including abstract knowledge.
3. Web 2.0 is a manifestation of social trends in technology. every change in social thinking will bring about educational innovation. Print, broadcast, TV, network 1.0
There have been a lot of cultural thoughts in 2.0. There are no application limitations, but there are only restrictions on thinking.
4. "abstract knowledge can be inherited". The two parts of this topic have problems. The essence of education is the unity of "inheritance and innovation". abstract knowledge transfer is not education, but replication, "Creation and re-abstraction" is progress.
Come on, continue to argue and summarize
If Edu 2.0 is a vision, it is necessary to exist. As for how to put forward their own understandings, we should need Collective wisdom (Collective
Intelligence ). This open discussion (learning) cannot happen in the "classroom.

Danny:I have different opinions on qiwei's "Education is a relatively closed system. Even if many schools are relatively "closed", it is easy to find that the growth of students cannot be "closed. For example, there are not many super girls in primary and secondary schools that do not know about Super Girls, supergirl games have greatly changed the views of many children on life, entertainment, idols, and the future. They will be deeply imprinted in their growth. For example, I would like to explain that with the development of science and technology, information networks are becoming more and more developed, and the education system is facing an urgent requirement of opening up. It is not a question of abstracting the knowledge that needs to be passed on in a relatively closed education system. This is an ever-changing society forcing its members: You must be open to keep up with my accelerated changes, otherwise, you will be eliminated.

Mathematics, Science, and other disciplines can achieve better learning efficiency in the controllable environment of the classroom, as long as the instructors and learners play their respective roles. However, this is not in conflict with the new network applications adopted by educators and learners. Observe the application of many educators and learners to blogs, wiki, and Web. They may remain in the data presentation mode and have not gone deep into the dynamic interaction between the Internet and offline, however, compared with the Web period, we can generally feel the true presence of independent individuals behind the network technology. This is a very important development of web, that is, 1.0 is moving towards 2.0. Further, how can we better link the technical application methods with the activities of real individuals in reality? How can we help learners (groups and individuals) Better learn on the network platform? These are the problems that Edu2.0 can solve in my mind.

I agree with Isaac that the emergence of many new technologies has changed the trend of social development by changing social thoughts. Education must be in place. There is no need to evaluate the value of any technical means or technical terms. as an educator, I think the focus of attention is, it should be put above whether technology can truly promote the effect of teaching and learning. Well, qiwei, I feel that what you understand is different from what most people understand. The Ramman did not understand Edu2.0 much yesterday. The term itself is not important. Do not use other words in Edu2.0 as long as we value the open, equal, and lifelong growth trends in education. The trend is hard to avoid.

Lizunlong: To study edu2.0, in general, we want to make ourselves learn more efficiently, so that we can keep up with this era more quickly and ultimately drive our society more vigorously.
Learning is an activity that people experience for life. Therefore, it is more necessary to innovate our learning methods. The so-called 2.0 is all about telling us that our learning methods should be developed and improved.
The development of the first force of web2.0 is bound to drive innovation in other surrounding areas, which makes edu2.0 easier.

The question is edu2.0 in my mind.
Want to learn. Education should not be conducted in schools. The school will eventually act as a place where educators gather and discuss, experiment, and research in reality. Edu2.0 needs to expand the scope of the concept of "school". The real effective learning and education are carried out in Informal learning time, that is, Informal.
Learning.
Learn at the goal. If everyone blindly carries out learning and education, it is inevitable that they will not be efficient, and through the guidance of people who have already learned-experienced people-can often find the right shortcut. Learning and Education aims to promote the development of our society. Learning aimed at serving the society truly serves our own learning. With edu2.0, you can find your own goals to get rid of the endless learning.
Learning and education are not isolated and single. In today's education, learning is learning, use is used, and play is not unified. Most of the learned knowledge is useless in addition to learning ability at work. Maybe this is one of the reasons why enterprises and college students cannot connect normally.

In fact, there are still a lot of imagination, all of which are disappointed with modern education. What we are disappointed with is not the poor education of school teachers, but the implicit harm to us in education. This may not only mean the harm to our generation, but also worse, as we get used to and accept this education system, we continue to make the best effort to harm our own descendants.
Fortunately, in relative states, people are different. Since it is different, let's make a difference.
(Note: lizunlong (Li zunlong) is a high school student in Tianjin. The business time has gone deep into the network. You can check out his website. Welcome to zunlong, which is from the perspective of Middle School Students)

Zheng Xiaoyun: For edu2.0, my understanding is the educational change trend driven by the concept and technology of web2.0.

In the early Internet era, there was no individual, so there was no social nature. It was just an information library and a digital library.
But now there are individuals on the Internet. Individuals and individuals are connected to each other through various platforms, tools, and mechanisms. The Internet is no longer the interconnection between machines, it has evolved into the interconnection between people in a digital network. In the Internet composed of social relationship networks, the network itself is both a media and a platform for social computing/filtering, everyone can interact with each other through this social network.
This is a technology level that has been around for a long time.
On the other hand, the Authority and regulation system are being broken down due to the high cost of information dissemination. Why should we make a long story and comply with the rules? We must be approved by the so-called editors before they can be published in the public media, the social network enables everyone's voice to have his/her own audience, and thus has value.
Value is generated because I get something from it, not because some people think it is valuable.
This is an important essence of the Web2.0 period and a prerequisite for the occurrence of user contribution.
Back to education, we should also let this idea take root among educators and learners, and let social network technologies and platforms penetrate into all aspects of education and learning.
Because it cannot be avoided, social networks have played a huge role in learning and self-education. When the network is spread across education and learners, It is Edu II.