Recently, I have been studying CMS because of my company's project relationship, but all the online materials are website content management systems (WCMS). I don't know what the exact definition of CMS is, but it does confuse me. Is cms a portal system (such as manbo )?
In my opinion, CMS should be purely content management, and all content in the system, including content classification and various attributes, should be able to adapt to different types of content and text, images, videos, files, audios, etc. Most of the so-called CMS is a portal system. Most of the information managed from the mall to the membership system to the BBS is text information. In my opinion, they are all very imperfect. For example, the CMS required for my current project is to provide content for N large business systems. All content is stored in CDN, however, all systems need to know what the content is and where it should be coordinated through CMS. As for publishing static pages and caches, these are the concerns of the page publishing system. These large business systems already have these functions.
In my opinion, CMS is a pure background system that cares about the content, attributes, categories, channel bindings, attribution bindings, types, and access methods of the content, if you need to integrate DRM, copyright is also an important attribute of the content.
All business systems and portals use CMS to obtain resources. They care about how the content is presented and how to organize the business logic using the content.
However, looking at a large number of network materials, there are very few (almost impossible to find) CMS, and what I have defined (WCMS) is everywhere, and it is really depressing.
If you have similar experience, you are welcome to discuss it.
