Why does abstract class need to implement interface members?

Source: Internet
Author: User
See the following code: Public interface ICreateTime
{
DateTime CreateTime
{
Get;
Set;
}
}

Public abstract class EntityBase: ICreateTime
{
Public EntityBase ()
{
CreateTime = DateTime. Now;
}
}

Is it intuitive?
But no, compilation cannot pass: 'entitybase' does not implement interface member' ICreateTime. createtime '. I know it is not implemented. Why should I mark it as abstract? I don't want to leave it to the subclass implementation?

After being depressed for a long time, I finally figured out why C #Implementation InterfaceAndOverride base class MethodThe difference is that C # compiler is too lazy. If Java does, it will automatically tell which methods are virtual and which ones are not convenient ..

Contact Us

The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion; products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem within 5 days after receiving your email.

If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to: info-contact@alibabacloud.com and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.

A Free Trial That Lets You Build Big!

Start building with 50+ products and up to 12 months usage for Elastic Compute Service

  • Sales Support

    1 on 1 presale consultation

  • After-Sales Support

    24/7 Technical Support 6 Free Tickets per Quarter Faster Response

  • Alibaba Cloud offers highly flexible support services tailored to meet your exact needs.