Why is Google a WEB Website?

To determine whether a web site is a Web site, I don't think it depends on whether the website uses technical means such as RSS. I think there should be a judgment standard to give my previous thoughts, I think this standard should be relative to the existing portal.

1. The content provided by the website should bePersonalization. That is to say, what I get from my website is what I want. I don't care about the richness of the content and how beautiful the Organization looks. In fact, I only care about whether I can find the content I'm interested in. This is the first principle. This article is much less than the existing Portal content. The existing portal is more of a media set and a collection of information, which may be rich in content, but cannot be guaranteed to be what I need (note, although it may be needed by most people ). When you access Google, you certainly do not access it because the page is "simple" (that is, the so-called simple). You need to get the connection or snapshot you need from Google, this must be presented to you according to what you need (that is, personalization.

2,Professional. That is to say, for a website, it is mainly to do one thing well, and he has done it to the extreme. We can see that only one thing can achieve a higher access volume than the portal. If you want to make a website ready, you must make it a portal. As a result, you will consider the core competitiveness after making it a portal, and it will never be perfect. What are the underlying reasons? I think there is a conflict between the fact that visitors cannot meet personalized or in-depth requirements for a large and comprehensive portal access experience. Google focuses on search and makes search a high level that is difficult for later users. This is an excellent embodiment of professionalism.

3,Localization. Although some people say that the Internet has turned the earth into a global village, Most netizens are most interested in the content around them. I may be concerned about the Paris riots in France, but I am afraid I am more worried about the property management problems in the community. I will be more concerned about the rise of Land Price in the region than global warming. Therefore, we can see that Google constantly launches various local versions, as well as local maps and other searches. In fact, this is not what Google does not want to do, but is currently difficult to do. People of insight in the portal are actually considering localization, such as Sina's iask and various classified advertisements.

 

Therefore, if the above three points can be used as the identification criteria for Web2.0, Google should already be a web site of Web2.0. I don't think that a technology like RSS is Web. It is only a technology, and she cannot decide the essential positioning of a website. Likewise, those discussions about the web Qian Jing are also wrong topics. Google tells us that web does not have a lack of Qian Jing and that looking at the market value of Google, do you not think that web finance is the future?