Why is the reference code of video webpages on YouTube and qqvideo so complicated !! Video
The reference should be simple and clear on the 56 network, and easy to modify: the editing of the 6 network is simple and easy to modify:
I just edited the multi-point touch screen technology article for a long time, so I tried to copy 56 pieces of code !!, Although the Code of YouTube and qqvideo has better compatibility, I still like the 56-bit short SWF file playback reference code...
The following code examples are compared:
YouTube code:
<Object Height = "355" width = "325"> </Object>
<Param name = "movie" value = "http://www.youtube.com/v/?z8exzndc&rel=1"> </param>
<Param name = "wmode" value = "Transparent"> </param> <embed src = "transport type =" application/X-Shockwave-flash "wmode =" Transparent "height = "355" width = "425"> </embed>
Qqvideo code:
<Object ID = "flashplayer" classid = "CLSID: D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" Height = "362" width = "426"> </Object>
<Param name = "movie" value = "http://video.qq.com/res/qqplayerout.swf? V = 0qxodkm1lql "> </param>
<Param name = "allowfullscreen" value = "true"> </param>
<Param name = "flashvars" value = "vid = 0qxodkm1lql & amp; CGI = http % 3A // signature> </param> <embed src =" http://video.qq.com/res/qqplayerout.swf? V = 0qxodkm1lql "type =" application/X-Shockwave-Flash "id =" flashplayer "name =" flashplayer "quality =" high "allowScriptAccess =" samedomain "allowfullscreen =" true" flashvars = "vid = 0qxodkm1lql & amp; CGI = http % 3A // video.qq.com/bin/vrank%3ftype%3d8%26start%3d7%26end%3d14” Height = "362" width = "426"> </embed>
Code 56:
<Embed src = "http://video.qq.com/res/qqplayerout.swf? Vid = 0qxodkm1lql "type =" application/X-Shockwave-flash "width =" 450 "Height =" 390 "> </embed>