Why use the visualsvn server instead of the Subversion? [SVN server selection]-from Network

Why use the visualsvn server instead of the Subversion?

SVN is divided into server and client, and server is divided into subversion and visualsvn Server

If you use subversion directly, in windows, to enable it to start with the system, you must encapsulate SVN server as the windws service and modify the configuration file to control user permissions, in addition, if you want to access Apache through the Web [http protocol], you must install and configure Apache. If you are a newbie, isn't it a headache? While visualsvn serve integrates subversion and Apache, saving all the above troubles. During installation, the svn server is encapsulated as the windws service, and the configuration of the Apache server is only on the image interface, specifying authentication methods, access ports, and other simple operations. In addition, user permission management is also configured through the image interface.

2. Why not use TFs?

Answer:

Because subversion and tortiosesvn were used at the beginning, no other software was changed. TFS has never been used. Actually, I just read someArticleI don't know about it.

3. Is the visualsvn server free of charge?

Answer:

Yes, visual SVN server is free of charge, while visual SVN is charged. Visualsvn is the svn client and integrated with Visual Studio. visualsvn server is the svn server, including subversion, Apache, and user and permission management. The advantages have been mentioned above.