Wisdom in ancient India is limited

 

In the past few days, I tried to get close to Buddhism. The sutra was indeed placed on the desk, but I still wanted to find something easier. So I turned over Wang bonvi's Translation on and off."Buddhist Sutra Story" (http://book.douban.com/subject/2353873/), never wanted to read the big lost. In terms of interest, this book choosesMost of the stories are boring and cool. They are nothing more than good deeds, ridicule, and infatuation. Almost all of them are just as straight as the story of McDull's mother: "A child never lie,Later, I made a fortune. A child liked to lie and died ."

In the "Peacock King" in the "Miscellaneous metaphor Sutra", it is said that the peacock King (the predecessor of the Buddha) was the predecessor of the Hunter (the traitor of Buddhism, tiapaddo. The story about him can be seen.Http://baike.baidu.com/view/806490.htm and http://www.dizang.org/qt/zh/037.htm) seize, with the whole Kingsoft To BribeIt is a pity that he is not tempting enough to release himself, because the king of the Peacock will enjoy a hundred gold and marry a daughter. As a result, the cloud hunter at the end of the peacock King is very crazy, his mind is full of fun, even accountNo. But I don't know why it's silly to say this kind of choice? Kingsoft is not yet a woman who has never met each other. It can be seen that this kind of man is clearly a man who has a crush on love.A passionate man who is eager to pursue. You have to say that he is crazy. I think he is cute.

Some stories about smart people are almost boring. It seems that ancient India's intellectual power is also limited. The "daughter-in-law" of "Miscellaneous treasure Sutra", "abandon the old country" and "Yin Sutra"The so-called difficulties in the two stories are horse-based mother-child identification, snake-based identification, and wood-based identification. It seems that this question is an entry to the ancient Indian smart man school,After training, it is not difficult to beat the title of a smart person.

The most angry part of this book is the "tree God" in the "Miscellaneous treasure Sutra ". The rich old man wants to eat meat. Hu refers to a tree as a tree God and deceives his sons to slaughter sheep to worship God. Then he can eat meat with him.Because of this business, I became one of my flock and was almost killed by my sons to sacrifice the tree. The story is funny, and the old man is funny. It's just unreasonable.Isn't it because wealthy people in ancient India want to eat meat and turn around to come up with such a tangle?

Alas, the Buddhist family's ability to tell stories cannot be really strong. So they rely on these things to help others realize the truth? I really doubt. A friend who is skilled in Buddhism may say that I am too superficial and cannot,A common person. In the future, if you can explain the Buddhist principles behind it, you must change it?