You are right about the technology. It's just your mistake.

In pureMonthly tribeSee this article. I have no idea about PhP and have no intention to intervene in the debate between PHP and ror. It is a pity that some of the seemingly eloquent arguments of pure month ignore the facts and draw conclusions, which is disappointing. If you like PHP, there is nothing wrong with it. To support PHP, it is your mistake to not perform basic fact checks. Comments:

[3. The essential difference between PHP and Ror, Java, and python is that the latter is for domain modal, and the former is for web scripts]

Rating: What is domain-oriented model )? Who said the essential difference is this so-called domain model? I always remind myself that "the words are easy and the words are not difficult", so I asked weakly, "Do you mind if you want to reference the document ?"?

[IBM and Oracle stressed the importance of integration in PHP's future. SDO and SCA were talked about as vehicles to help create enterprise-class PHP that can be utilized in more than just situational instances.

The blue giant has long seen J2EE's bloated and powerless web enterprise application development. IBM has also studied Ror, but gave up. IBM finally chose PHP. ]

Comment: The above English section is no problem. However, from this article of public relations in English, the following conclusion is just a piece of talk. "The blue giant has long seen J2EE's bloated and powerless web Enterprise Application Development "? What is WebSphere Commerce written by me? Note that WebSphere Commerce 6.0 was released in March this year, and the partnership between IBM and PHP was announced last year. What about WebSphere process server? What about WebSphere Portal Server? What's strange about the cooperation between a department and PHP when IBM is so huge? Of course, it's still "easy to say and not difficult to say". The old man of pure moon made an amazing speech, so don't come up with some amazing evidence to say no to the past? IBM abandoned Ror? The boss suddenly decided on the Technology Trend of IBM and admired it. But why does ibm release the DB2 ror Starter Kit this month? Why are there so many discussions on ror on IBM wiki? Don't talk nonsense if you don't know the internal operating mechanism of IBM. IBM has multiple internal departments paying attention to one technology at the same time, and there is still less time for each of them to compete? If "IBM gave up ROR", It would be big news.

[When a domain modal passes through Dao, service, and MVC layers, people finally find that the so-called design pattern is nothing more than a bloated 8-unit article. Even if you follow all the design patterns, you cannot develop programs with excellent performance and user-friendly interfaces. Why? All enterprise application problems, from caching to rich clients, are encountered and solved by any programming language .]

Comment: This passage is too elegant. I really don't understand how the last sentence can be an argument for "You cannot develop programs with excellent performance and friendly interfaces. How does layer-by-layer packaging show that the "Design Model" is a bloated 8-unit article? What logic?

[How about hibernate? Do you not need an Oracle engineer? Can you use spring or ror to develop a million registered user Blog system like csdn? ]

Comment: This Article is also elegant. Of course, Oracle engineers are not required. If my database is from DB2, why Oracle engineers? For million users, please, boss. Please do some basic research before drawing conclusions. 12 W is P. Where can we use a business website built with spring + hibernate to support users? Update: Some people say that shopping cart is a simple application. In fact, the shopping cart does not support a simple 12 w x 300 blog page: Order division, order return, order delivery, multiple shipping addresses, RFQ, gift management, product Association, cross-region, up-shopping, instant promotions based on shopping cart items and user behaviors, background Bi, quick order, user comments, user surveys, user ratings, and user tagging. There are more computing tasks. The computing of Product Association alone is not small. The modules involved in the shopping cart include catalog, inventory, order, marketing, Bi, payment, gifting, and user. Such a computing scale is not as strange as reading, writing, and accessing a blog.

[As predicted at the beginning of the year, Ror is dead .]

Same? What is evidence? The number of ROR meetings increases every year. Ror applications increase every year. Sales of ROR books increase year-on-year. The number of ROR developers increases every year. All of these are proof-of-stock data. I don't know what the evidence of ROR's death is?

Summary: programmers are to be despised.