Zhou Hongyi, high commander

I still feel it is necessary to quickly write down some of my ideas.

First, his views on new employee Zhou Hongyi's speech.

To be honest, Zhou Hongyi is better than many others. So if I prefer to reference him, it is true.

As for the recruitment style of a company, it is determined by the company itself, and no one else has the right to comment. Some people say that week is a big pie, and the employees are desperate. Are there other purposes for new employees to speak nonsense?

However, I do not think that the idea of selecting candidates by week is acceptable in other companies. The reason is: in the past decade, we have heard many people say similar things. For example, we should not be mediocre people, people with no idea, or people with no idea, our company only needs ambitious people, entrepreneurial people, and so on.

As a result, many of the companies that follow this principle will encounter troubles.

In fact, a team with a fighting power is like a concrete aggregate. It has to pay special attention to the configuration. There must be big stones and small stones. Sometimes it is good to put some pebbles in. An efficient team should be available to all people with different characteristics. The key is to work together. People who have no idea but have a level, no idea but are serious enough must have a team. Without the mediocre executors, the strength and capabilities of the savvy entrepreneurs cannot be magnified or enhanced, and the larger ideas cannot be realized. I have seen some companies, and there are some famous cattle in the lattice room. Each of them has a special idea. They don't accept anyone from each other. Finally, they didn't see anything wrong.

In fact, many things are finally made, which is totally different from the original idea. If you carefully analyze whether there are great contributions from people with ideas or those without ideas, it is difficult to explain. However, people with ideas tend to be fooled, so that the outside world can take credit for them.

High Commander, father of Java, was removed from Oracle. I talked to high-tech director three times. He was most impressed by the way he spoke. He muttered and buzzing like a Tang Monk chanting and dancing like a fly, which made people sleepy. To put it this way, in terms of the level of speech, the antonym of the high commander is Hitler. But what about it? The high commander is a computer scientist, a top programmer in the world, not to mention that he speaks like a fly, that is, he looks like a fly, and he is also the creator of the world's most popular programming language.

Just like this old man, I was surprised to hear a lot of bitter complaints from reporters due to my own speculation. But in fact, his old man complained that he did not step on the page.

When Mr. Gao was in Sun, Mr. Gao was a vice president with no title. High treatment, but the employees do not really care about people. It's easy. computer scientists don't really care about people. He only needs to do java well and be a good master or Idol.-Of course, I still want to emphasize that if he doesn't speak, pretty idol. When I speak, I vomit.

However, the Oracle system is not so high in pure technology, so it is a different way to get rid of the old high head.

The irony is that Oracle is not a technology-less company. Although Mr. Smith and Edison are both arrogant, and his private life is going down like Eric erkensong, it does not mean that he does not pay much attention to technology. Oracle technology is actually amazing.

In other words, even the best technical staff in Oracle won't be treated as vice president, but it doesn't affect the company's technical level.

Why? Since the advent of the Internet era, it is much easier for programmers to improve their technical skills, which leads to an increase in the supply, level, and price of high-level programmers.

In the programmer circle, the saying "Excellent programmers are 100 times more efficient than mediocre programmers" is circulated. I guess the motive for making such dummies is good. I hope to intimidate the management and win more benefits for the programmer class. However, this is useless. The reality is not to put you together with 100 heads of dummies for the boss to pick, but to compare you with other levels, the salary is only half of your people. Maybe you are smart, have good algorithms, master the bottom layer, take the competition rank, and have done something to show off, but in the Internet age, in fact, another person who looks more mediocre than you and has only a fraction of your salary, once placed in that role, put it in that environment, as long as the intelligence is normal, serious enough, willing to work hard, there is a temper in year 34, it can fully achieve and surpass the so-called "master" level in terms of cost effectiveness. I have seen many of these situations. programmers who seem mediocre at the beginning have grown into the technical backbone of the company after several years of practice. On the other hand, the people who came in with a halo quickly felt that they did not seem to have any advantages. There was a familiar expert who told me not long ago that he had spent some time practicing things in year 34, and now the new guy has mastered things for a year, which made him feel quite vulnerable.

In fact, this is a special thing in the field of programming-the spread of Internet development knowledge and experience is too helpful. Today, the best way to solve a problem and grasp one aspect of knowledge is not to read a book, nor to think hard, but to search Google. I have a deep understanding of this. I have encountered many problems that have plagued me for many years. Finally, I found several articles, posts, and blogs to solve them thoroughly. Honestly, I am also confused. I don't know if the countless hours I spent on these issues have any significance. At least in coding, if new users can read these articles, they may not understand the same problem, but the code is no worse than me.

Although cool is an engineer, cool is not cost-effective. In Oracle's view, engineers with similar levels can be found at a much lower cost, so Java can develop well. So I am tempted. That's it.

What does this mean for programmers? This means that you should not put your professional strengths fully on programming technology, but establish an inaccessible advantage on the Internet in another field. This is really a big problem. Every developer should think about it.

----

Reprinted: mengyan http://blog.csdn.net/myan/article/details/5910877

Zhou Hongyi, high commander