crucible code review tool

approach, and I don't think I can see it in the future. I think the reason for this is that this kind of process has a lot of overhead, and not many teams use it. However, if you are developing software that is life-or-death and can be lost because of a flaw, it makes sense to look for software defects in such a structured way. For example, you are developing software for nuclear power plants. You may need a very formal process to ensure that the final hand-over

to run or run on demand.Multiple systems with OpenVAS installed can be controlled by a single master, making it an extensible Enterprise vulnerability assessment tool. The project's compatible standards allow it to store scan results and configurations in SQL database so that they can be easily accessed by external reporting tools. The client tool accesses the OpenVAS manager through an XML-based stateless

For Windows:1. Download and install Rbtools with python2.7:: https://downloads.reviewboard.org/releases/RBTools/0.7 Select EXE filePath after installation: C:\Program Files (x86) \rbtools2. Configure environment variables: RBT and Python:c:\program files (x86) \rbtools\python27c:\program files (x86) \rbtools\bin 3. Encoding problem: Do not add the following files, will error code\rbtools\python27\lib\site-packages directory under the new Add File site

Code review is a process by which code quality is improved by reviewing codes, which occupies an extremely important position in the XP method, and has become an indispensable part of software engineering. This paper discusses some concepts and experiences of code review, an

Code review is a process by which code quality is improved by reviewing codes, which occupies an extremely important position in the XP method, and has become an indispensable part of software engineering. This paper discusses some concepts and experiences of code review, an

save time. In fact, this is not a lot of engineer culture in the country, this way is relatively good early implementation.Tools for code ReviewThis thing in the team, it is necessary to have a tool, the relevant tools are many, the review method is also biased. Here are some of the main tools to solve these problems:1 A more intuitive interface to see diff.2. S

implemented in this way by reviewing the new code for the request merge online and adding comments to the line of code in question.Comments can be seen by anyone who has permission to view the warehouse, and everyone can reply to any comment, a bit like a discussion on a post in the forum.This mode is audited after the event, that is, the code has been submitted

Introduction IBM Rational Team Concert (RTC) is a software development environment on the IBM rational next-generation collaboration platform for software delivery technology-jazz platform, which enables agile development through integrated work item tracking, source control, and configurable process management. Process management is an important feature that distinguishes it from the generic version management tool, and it focuses more on integratin

Code Review is a commonly used tool in software development, and it is easier to identify problems that are more difficult to find than QA testing, and to help team members improve programming skills, unified programming style, and more. 1. Code review requires the team to

. Many tools are available in the industry, such as. Net-based ncover and Visual Studio test, while jcover, Hansel, and codecover are available in Java. Code coverage rate may reflect some problems. If there is code with coverage rate lower than 20%, you may have to question it .. please note... there may be a good reason, but this is more of the beginning of a conversation than just a report card. Arch

superiors and subordinates. Perhaps the biggest obstacle to code review is fear. Developers are afraid to miss the deadline, be afraid of distractions, and invest too much time. For any established team, the effectiveness of the Code review is between the two-a friendly silver bullet or a killer by the team. Of cours

Remember the last time review Board This online code review tool was a year ago, when the review Board version was 1.0.3; A colleague from the department is also tossing review Board, but now the version has been upgraded to 1.5.1

author Shaojian posted on December 8, 2010 4:51 A.M. Eric Landes recently described code reviews as a tool to help teams improve their software maturity, and ultimately to deliver higher value to customers, in an article called Agile skills: when and how to conduct code reviews. He introduces code reviews from the fol

, so it is recommended to make a low-level review, such as whether there is a comment.There is a special concern in implementation correctness and design rationality. The performance problem here refers to whether it is caused by design and implementation, this may cause the review part to become the bottleneck of the entire module or system, rather than a local optimization that is insignificant. Otherwise

include code review for a digital TV CA system (25 programmers only have 1 test, which has been used for CCTV) code review of a telecom billing system (2400 defects found in one week), review of a telecom O M system (200 important defects found in two days, one of which ha

This article organizes the basic process of submitting code to the OpenStack community, as well as some information about the community. If there is reprint, please indicate the source!Let's take a picture to illustrate the general flow of OpenStack code review:The process for submitting code changes to OpenStack is mainly as follows: Configuring Git and

. Trying to create a "Dictionary" for your project introduction means that when this code is involved, you can check whether the usage and environment of the Code are appropriate, which is easily detected. 5. Select appropriate tools If developers are using the eclipse development tool (Eclipse IDE plug-in Jupiter ), you can view

all problems, nor a poison to hurt the team. After some thinking and discussion with some colleagues, I think that the success of the code review is about the factors of trust and training. Team members must believe that feedback from code reviews is not a judgment of individual attacks or of their abilities. The censor must believe that the censor will not re

Automatically submit a code review request using RbtoolObjectiveLet's recall the process of submitting a review request manually: First you have to generate the diff file with svn diff > filename.diff. Then enter the URL of the review board, which may be rb.companyname.com You will then need to enter y

, find enough defects, and only care about what the problem is and how it is caused, no matter who wrote the code Measure tool ("Big Brother") is a double-edged sword. Self-constraint: do as much as possible even if you do not have time to complete all code checks. Lightweight code