About measuring the use of professional software experience and recommendations

Because of the development of information big data, all walks of life unavoidably with the information discipline to have the intersection, my study specialized for surveying and mapping engineering, the surveying and mapping profession also has many people to develop a lot of useful measurement software. So from the perspective of students, how we look at the application of these software, here on my own point of view, there may be a lot of immature places, welcome everyone to criticize.
I'd like to say a few words about the most commonly used software CASS7.0 in engineering surveying.
Cass is indeed powerful, providing us with great convenience in mapping topographic maps. After the end of the one-day internship, the use of data exported from the total station, imported into Cass, to determine the scope and scale, you can directly display the field survey points, can be directly into the map using encoded files, can also be used to draw the CAD principles of drawing. In addition, the direct creation of DTM facilitates the direct invocation of contour lines and callouts automatically drawn. Cass on the basis of the development of CAD, retained a lot of CAD drawing method, for the modification of the graphics is also very familiar.
But a software can not be perfect, more or less always some need to improve the place, now on my experience to mention a few small comments.
First After each internship from the total station to export data after a lot of steps to be processed to become CASS7.0 recognition of data, its process for the less familiar people too cumbersome, from the total station to export through Excel to convert a large number of content, so the new version of Cass can be improved in this aspect of the show, for example, Cass identification data, can be more Some format support, as far as possible to make the exported data reduction modification can be used directly.
Second, every time Cass is opened, there will be a lot of toolbars, some of the contents of the toolbar is not familiar to us, or even common, you can streamline these toolbars, or specifically to develop a concise learning version.
Third, the plot of the field in most cases requires more than a group of forces to complete, each group to complete a plot of the area, in the integration into a large map when the changes can be based on the calculation of the software automatic modification is very convenient. For example, two graph contour intersection, if you can click on two contours to automatically modify.
These are some of my feelings and suggestions for using CASS7.0, perhaps a lot of immature places, but I still put forward my proposal, I hope you can express your views.

About measuring the use of professional software experience and recommendations