About the online games of major companies:
Share/Add to favorites the perfect game. All games are carved out of that model. There is no change, and the fixed investment is large. Many items must be purchased. The basic investment is more than 300 RMB.
If you don't play a game of giants, don't go if you don't want to throw money.
Shanda can only say that Shanda only acts as an agent and does not develop it on its own, but only acts as an agent to succeed: Legend. The recent legend rumor is an enhanced version of legend. However, this game is too old to keep up with the times. Other grand games have failed! The result is a bear.
Kingsoft, I personally like it. Self-developed, swordsman, Generation 1, generation 3, and swordsman world. Advantages: There are many patterns, a variety of task systems, with background and good picture. For 2D systems, there is no need to spend too much. Every month, 15--50 can reach the upper level. The disadvantage is that there are too many occupations, such as the swordsman world, 12 sects, and 24 occupations. This is also an advantage, but if there are too many occupations, there will certainly be problems with balance, when Kingsoft finds a balance problem, it will change it. This is a big headache. It was originally a great career. If it was changed by him, it may be a waste. Unacceptable.
9 city, with a grand look, proxy Wang. But the agent's skill is worse than Shanda's. The miracle is lost in the bug. Wow's success is more due to the name of war3. Wow, this game is generally a kind of out-of-the-box game that people are very self-righteous to play. However, this game is not suitable for ordinary people. 1 is the requirement for high configuration, 2 is the game too troublesome, and 3 is the need for a large amount of time investment.
Netease, fantasy westward journey, westward journey. Mine-based game. This kind of game is a detour because I was disgusted with being put on a mine when I was playing xianjian. However, it is estimated that NetEase can connect to the world through a single network.
The Three Kingdoms type, originated from single-host games, two: The Three Kingdoms, the Three Kingdoms. It's not bad for the Three Kingdoms group, but it's not bad for the card type. If I have paid for the card but want to spend money to buy the item, I can't say it's over, and the picture won't work. Although it uses the standalone version of the Three Kingdoms, the picture has not reached that level. The Three Kingdoms, strategic, do not like to play, do not touch, and have no right to speak.
As for those small companies, we won't talk about it. The strength is not good. Naturally, we don't have to expect anything to do.