Are you sure you want to take a picture of your child?
13:46:49 people's website
Zhang tianwei
The regulations on the protection of minors in Beijing began to be implemented as of January 1, January 1 this year. With the implementation of the regulations, the photos of the young hero Lai ning were also "picked from the campus walls ".
More than a decade ago, laining, a 14-year-old boy, sacrificed to save the fire. Later, as a young hero of "brave and brave", Lai Ning was set up as an example for teenagers throughout the country to learn. His photos were also "mounted to campus walls ".
As a matter of fact, Lai ning has always had different opinions on his specific practices in the face of mountain fires since he was widely publicized. In particular, he has always been criticized for setting up LAI Ning as a model for teenagers and encouraging them to learn. Children are protected objects. In the face of a disaster like a mountain fire, children should first be rescue objects for adults, rather than making them take the same responsibilities that they are powerless and should not.
Ten years later, with the implementation of the regulations on the protection of minors in Beijing, Lai Ning's photos were also taken away, which seems to indicate that our society has not only clearly realized the need to protect minor children, in addition, he stepped out of the high-profile moral misunderstanding of the past, which did not practically encourage his children to "be brave", and restored his rational attitude and pragmatic spirit in youth education.
However, to protect your children, do you have to take down the photos of Lai Ning, help them strengthen their self-protection awareness, and do not encourage them to follow the brave actions of Lai Ning beyond their abilities and responsibilities, is it necessary to deny the altruistic spirit of Lai Ning's behavior? There is still room for discussion in the face of these issues.
In terms of education for teenagers, there is always a dilemma that cannot be resolved. That is, children should not be taught to be selfish and ignore others, and they must not be responsible for encouraging their children to stand up for risks without any doubt. Protecting children's life, health, and safety is the responsibility of society. educating future generations with a noble personality is also the responsibility of society. Ignoring the previous aspect is a dereliction of duty in society. Giving up on the latter may lay a hidden danger for the future of society. At the beginning, we publicized the story of Lai Ning and called on the children to learn in various ways, such as hanging photos. We did use the brave behavior of the children to stimulate adult society in the "moral decline" situation. In this pragmatic propaganda strategy under the high moral profile, the children's life security and the responsibility of society for protecting their children are ignored. However, to protect the child's name, the first thing we deny is not the fault of an adult, but the spiritual value of our behavior.
Simply put, if we didn't have a picture of Ryan, we would never have it. If we didn't have a picture of him on the campus wall, we would never have it. But now that he is down, he should not pick it up-no matter how low-level mistakes the adult society has made in this case, he should not be accused of this, and his spirit should not be denied. Lai Ning's behavior should not be imitated, especially because adults cannot encourage children to follow suit. But he himself should always be respected, especially by adults.
Indeed, how to encourage children to respect Lai Ning and help them strengthen their self-protection consciousness is an art of education that requires subtle mastery; it is a difficult or even embarrassing task to explain to a child the contradiction between the original propaganda of the story of Lai Ning and the failure to imitate his behavior. However, the practice of simplifying the difficult problem by removing the mark of Lai Ning is the same as the low-level strategy for promoting his deeds.
At the beginning, for a practical purpose, his photo was mounted to the wall; now, for another practical purpose, his photo was taken. We are sorry for him.