Beauty picture and QQ image comparison evaluation

Look at the picture software a huge, homogeneity of serious, people difficult to choose. ACDSee and other old look software seems to have "Lianpo", and the United States to see, QQ images, such as the new generation of image software to a smaller volume, faster speed to get users favor, today we will be good choice, let us look at the picture and QQ image for a PK, to see which software can meet the needs of users to see the map.

Evaluation environment:

Cpu:intel Pentium Dual-core E5200

Motherboard: Tepo xblue-p43

Memory: Wei just 2G DDR2

Hard drive: WD 320GB 7200 rpm

Operating system: Windows XP SP2

Network environment: 3MB ADSL

Profiling objects:

1, QQ Image 1.0 Beta2

2, the United States to see the picture 2.0.4

One, compatible format: Beauty map to see more rich

Whether the compatible image format is enough, it is an important index to evaluate the software of drawing. Today's review starts with two software-compatible image formats. We have tested the two software compatible image format, and the test results are shown in the following table (Figure 1).

Figure 1 Compatibility Format number comparison

★ Comments: From the compatible image format, the United States to see Support 33 image format, you can directly browse the PDF document, and QQ images only support 15 kinds of image format. The beauty map looks at a richer image format compatible.

Second, the speed of operation: the United States map to see faster

In addition to the compatible image format, another indicator of concern is the speed of browsing images. Next we test the launch speed of the two software and the speed of browsing the image, and the test results are shown in the following figure (Figure 2).

Figure 2 Starting and viewing speed contrast (in seconds)

★ Comments: From the test data, whether it is the software start speed, or browse the speed of pictures, the United States to see more than the image of QQ faster. The beauty chart looks faster and has an obvious advantage.

Third, resource occupancy: The United States to see more energy-saving

The system resources is valuable, if a software occupies the resource too big, slows down the system to run the speed, will eventually be discarded by the user. Below we will test the two software when browsing the image of memory and CPU occupancy, the test results shown in the following figure (Figure 3).

Figure 3 CPU and memory resource footprint comparisons

★ Comments: From the test results, two of software resources are not occupied, compared to the United States to see more "energy-saving", the memory and CPU resources are less than the use of QQ images.

Four, image processing: QQ image more powerful

Look at the picture software is attached to the image processing function, the United States to see and QQ image with the image processing function who is more powerful? Below we have two software to actually operate some, see who image processing function is more powerful.

QQ Image has a more powerful image processing functions, not only a key to beautify the picture, but also for the picture plus a border, jewelry, for the picture to add a variety of effects (Figure 4). In addition, the QQ image and the network "marriage", with the QQ Space Close association, can be very convenient to quickly upload the picture to the QQ space.

Fig. 4 The image processing function of QQ image is powerful

Compared with the QQ image, the United States to see the image processing features with a slightly monotonous, only batch conversion format, batch renaming, batch modification size. But we should also see the beauty of the picture to see a strong mito to do the backing, the need to deal with the picture can be directly call the United States Mito for image processing, so as to effectively make up the beauty of the map to see their own image processing capacity deficiencies (Figure 5).

Figure 5 Calling US Mito processing images

★ Comments: From the image processing function, the QQ image is more powerful, but the United States to see the picture can directly call the United States Mito processing pictures, to make up for their own deficiencies, and the United States Mito image processing ability than QQ image is much more powerful.

Evaluation summary: Look at the picture with the beautiful picture to see more convenient

After trial and test, the United States to see in the compatibility format, resource occupancy, operating speed, and many other important indicators are more than QQ image, although the image processing capacity of the Mito is not as strong as the QQ image, but can be made up with the United States. Beauty picture and QQ image are good image software, if just to see the map, with the United States to see more convenient, faster.