This software is undoubtedly a good software, software developers have a considerable level, can be said to be excellent software writers, but also just excellent software personnel, the industry has specialized, they in other aspects I think there is a great lack of.
I think, they do not grasp the psychology of consumers, first of all, in the current environment, there are a lot of free games exist, so, want to let users pay to buy a game is very difficult, because the user has a lot of choices, so, even if he likes this game, he will probably choose another free, A game with a slightly lower liking than the game, and the number of such users is quite large.
Second, this game is for a lot of people, but I don't think it's a good way. Maybe a lot of people like this game, but, but also just like, not love, I think with a lot of people like, rather let less people to love more can get benefits, so, I think in the original game design, this idea has a problem.
Good software definition can have many kinds, from the screen, logic and other aspects of consideration, can be regarded as a good software, but, from the innovative, not a enough innovative game, I think this kind of game in the market there are many, but may not be as beautiful as this game.
So, I think the developer of this game, software programming aspect is not bad, wrong in other aspects. First of all, the current market is not enough to understand, do not understand the current game market status. Successful businessmen should not only have good goods, but also have a very unique vision, to grasp the psychology of consumers, to sell the goods. In addition, there is a word in business is called "small profits but quick turnover", so, I think the price of the game may be high, so that users do not feel worthwhile, not willing to buy.
Chapter One-Question 13th (the game team, there is good software, but the business model and other factors outside the software has been taken into account?) )--by Liang