Comparison and summary of communication equipment vendors

In terms of IP Internet, telecom equipment vendors only use cisco at the core, and Cisco is very embarrassed now. junipor or Huawei is also hitting the market in other countries. in addition, Huawei accounts for two or 1/4 of the bearer networks of the three major carriers in China, excluding political factors. junipor is doing well in China Mobile and China Telecom.

 

 

In terms of transmission, Ericsson and Huawei and Alcatel account for many of them. Cisco does not,

 

In terms of ATM, Cisco and Huawei quit.

 

The exchange is still the best in Ericsson, followed by Bell/Huawei. Cisco does not.

 

In terms of access networks, Cisco does not. Ericsson has Redback. dslam or Alcatel, but now it seems like Huawei.

 

For the Ring Network, Alcatel/Huawei/nosi, Cisco does not

 

The G network base station is the strongest in Ericsson, followed by nosi/Huawei/Alcatel. Cisco does not

 

Network C base station, Alcatel/Nortel/ZTE

 

NGN: Bell/Huawei. I don't know what about Cisco/e.

 

WiMAX/WiFi: Cisco burst products.

 

In the world, sales of C are 1st, e is the second, and HW is the fifth.

However, C in the Chinese market is obviously relatively weak, and it seems to account for about 7% of the world. The high-end products include Juniper. The following are the two sides of H and H3. Let's see the cn2 share of China Telecom.
Cisco's 60% market is in North America, while North America is the most closed. Not only Huawei, but ZTE cannot get in, that is, Ericsson and Alcatel are also struggling. Specifically, Moto, Nortel and the merged Lucent are playing. Cisco has the highest sales because it occupies a monopoly in the North American market.

 

Analysis of Cisco, scores, enterprise market, operator market, and transformation market (represented by telepresence and Unified Communication)
Cisco's enterprise market is its largest, such as the National Tax, finance, and even public security network.

Cisco's operator market share is shrinking, reducing profits. Cisco, a high-end router product, has many advantages and is still ahead of the technical level, but is challenged by HW.

Cisco's transformation market is also well positioned
Outside of the market, Cisco's strategic and forward-looking capabilities are well performed, which is not comparable to other equipment companies.

 

Cisco's disadvantage is that its products are not fully operational and mobile products are not good. Even bras products cannot be used.

 

Ericsson's major mistake in recent years is that it did not acquire juniper in the current year, and Ericsson was very poor in IP. The acquisition of edge router Redback also wanted to increase the strength of IP.
If we were able to work with juniper in the past, the current Ericsson estimates would be totally different.

 

Cisco promotes WiMax and broadband mobility. Ericsson promotes LTE and mobile broadband.
However, E has obvious advantages here. So many GWs around the world are moving towards LTE, and the future of WiMAX is still unknown.