During development, I encountered a tricky Flying Pigeon book

In some scenarios, many people may feel like they once knew each other:

1. during development, I encountered a tricky Flying Pigeon book, suchCodeThe execution result is not as expected. After debugging for a long time, I felt that everything was normal, but the result was incorrect. In desperation, I asked someone to help me with the analysis. When you described the Flying Pigeon book to others, suddenly there was an epiphany, and there was a thought in your mind: Oh, maybe XX had a Flying Pigeon book. Then, I followed the train of thought and quickly found out the crux of the problem.

2. One day, the Leader asks you to write a PPT to report your recent work. When I write a draft, I feel that I, II, III, and IV have a clear understanding of what I want to say, but when I write a draft, I also found that my mind's thoughts could not be easily poured out like a bowl of water, and even I had to write the first sentence for a long time.

3. Friday is the time for design review, or the company has arranged for you to present a product to users. You have done a lot of exercises in private for this public appearance, but when you come on stage, it will still feel a sense of helplessness that "there is no way to easily interpret the theme.

We usually have no audience when thinking about Flying Pigeon books. Our thoughts are loopback in the brain. We think we are very careful, but in fact, it has a very high LEAP (you can experience it. The effect of self-talking and meditation is completely different, and it is different to think about drawing with a pen, when we try to express our ideas, we often find vulnerabilities.

While we are writing, especially when writing documents for presentations such as PPT, we generally assume an audience. For example, we will try our best to examine our achievements from the perspective of others, we will also talk about it in our hearts, and even drill into the camera.

However, when we really face a room, we have a completely different experience, especially in the absence of experience. The pace of your exercises will be disrupted; some people will ask questions, but you will find that this Flying Pigeon book will be mentioned later; some will go away, and I have already explained it before to your Flying Pigeon book; there are still others who have nothing to do with the current topic... ... There are many situations, but I am most afraid of seeing a room with a blank face.

At this time, in order to ensure the effectiveness of the speech, we must reelaborate on the current topic in another way. In the short time of restructuring, the speaker should judge where the Flying Pigeon book is located, is it necessary to make more preparations? So, in an instant, there are too many things to say, but I don't know what to say in a rush, or I will talk about half in one direction, I suddenly felt that I had to explain something in another direction and suddenly changed the topic... ...

Therefore, what we think we "think clearly" may not be "clearly", but what we write clearly may not be "clearly ". Everyone has at least two languages: the language and spoken language used for brain thinking. Later, after learning, we have mastered the written language. Those great thinkers use words to pass their thoughts into the world; those great speakers use words to spread their thoughts. They are the best two-way translators in these three languages.

QualifiedProgramPersonnel who are good at thinking and can efficiently turn their ideas into program language code. However, there are a lot of programmers who want to turn their ideas into both written and spoken languages, poor performance. This kind of ability needs to be exercised. However, when the opportunity is in front of us, not everyone knows how to cherish and use it, or even "never regret it when it is lost." I once doubted that, whether many people regard writing documents and making speeches at the meeting as hard work.

What I want to talk about is that in the context that everyone in the IT industry talks about transformation, everyone talks about more than 30 people, and ten years later, everyone talks about the way out, programmers should not focus on improving their skills in communicating with computers. programmers should not always ask, "confused, what technology should I learn" and so on. Technical experts can be a perfect shot, But Comrade Mao should not be promoted only by being accurate. No matter what work he does, clear thinking is the most basic requirement, however, the two secrets, "clearly written" and "clearly explained", will undoubtedly have more powerful comprehensive competitiveness. (Http://www.freeeim.com /)