Final release of 48-hour user Survey report

group name: Golden State Warriors

project name: Online examination system

team members: Yin Liangliang (group leader), Hanbin, Hao Nan, Teshritu

Start time December 1, 2016 15:05, Deadline December 3 8:30, number of users is 6

Project Sharing Link: http://123.207.159.79:8080/exam/

Project Promotion Way: QQ group, talk about; group chat, Friends Circle

User feedback: QQ, and other private messages

48-Hour User count: 6 people

User Feedback Statistics:

Q1 : Evaluation of the overall system? (indicator: System overall; assignment range: Overall experience including browsing, operation)

Number of feedback: 6:

User 1: Very fun, can be used in many specialized courses or elective courses

User 2: Examinee system is very interesting, self-test questions such as good, often do not know what to watch the elective course

User 3: This is very convenient, suitable for students and teachers

User 4: Do very good, practical very strong

User 5: Can be directly used to feel, more convenient than to pass documents to each other

User 6: Run again Smooth point better, others can

Q2 : What is your view on the system interface? (Indicator: interface effect; assignment range: login, examinee, exam management, System management Interface)

Number of feedback: 6

User 1: The exam interface does not have to be too fancy, so it's good

User 2: Overall very good, just feel a little empty? may be related to less data.

User 3: Landing screen picture and the box on the right is too far away, inside good, simple and generous

User 4: The font is a little small, nothing else.

User 5: Very good, is some toolbar alignment is not very good, obsessive-compulsive disorder = =| | |

User 6: Good, concise and clear

Q3 : Can an exception occur in the operation? (indicator: Operation effect; assignment range: all reasonable operations supported by the system)

Number of feedback: 6

User 1: No

User 2: No, candidate login is a bit dull

User 3: No

User 4: No, it's very smooth.

User 5: No

User 6: No

Q4 : Can I have a suggestion? (subjective, user free to play)

Number of feedback: 2

User 1: To classify the subjects or options, the subject of more will be messy?

User 4: Self-test system interesting, is not necessary to fill the score? Is this question bank the same as the exam?

Summarize:

Reviewed six users the overall evaluation of the online examination system, and patiently answered a few issues raised by the publisher, from which feedback is not difficult to see the actual user more concerned about the direction, because most of the students asked for the student, the general interest in the candidate module more intense. We also thank two users for their additional suggestions, which are very specific and can help our projects to be more perfect and better.

Final release of 48-hour user Survey report