Video-sharing site potatoes had a facelift a while ago. When a single video file is played, its background is black. I always like the Black Bottom page (only visually, I know that black and white is not suitable for reading), Black page will make people feel cool and very shock. Potatoes seem to understand this. At the same time keep the white bottom style of the homepage, its storypage becomes black.
For a while, potatoes got a bit of advertising sponsorship, which lined up the ads behind video files. Users appreciate those videos and see the big ads behind them. This is a good innovation. It is estimated to be inspired by the sponsors ' logos that have been appearing under the TV series. Network video is a few minutes of gadgets, limited to speed, usually, there will not be too much video, therefore, the chip is not a good model. This ad substrate is a relatively sensible approach.
However, this proves a point: Video site, is the standard web1.0 mode.
I'm a blogger, and it's hard to imagine giving users a few ads behind their log pages. This will be a head-on attack on the user. Not surprisingly, because all the content in the blog is User contribution. Blog user's personal territory feel very strong, the substrate ads will only accelerate the death of BSP.
So, the potato substrate, why not see the user's strong opposition? At the very least, I don't see anyone who is saying that infringes the rights of those who upload video.
I think the reason is very simple, two:
One, the upload is always a minority, for example, YouTube only 0.16% of the user is the upload. Most people are spectators, and look at Sina's Web page without any difference. You are advertising-related.
Second, the original video is always a minority. There is no number to prove this, but the current DV consumption from the Chinese can be understood. Chinese video site, a large number of the works are suspected of infringement. Since the upload itself is not the owner of the copyright works, others in the back of the ads, also embarrassed what Luo.
This is no different from the Sina model: Most of the people on the station are spectators, and the content contributors mostly contribute to others ' things (such as newspapers).
A typical 1.0 pattern.
The audience, is still the audience, not partner.
Of course, it doesn't matter.
It's good to make money, isn't it?