First, I think the owner may have incorrect understanding about group buying and platforms. Although the Group Buying business also has the features of the Platform (each merchant makes a group buying on the platform of the group buying company ). At present, the core value of group buying for sellers is to get the experience of new customers as soon as possible at a very low price. The value of group buying for consumers is to try new products and services at a very low price, or get benefits. In the group buying model, merchants often focus on service businesses with repeated consumption habits. From this perspective, the things mentioned by the landlord are basically irrelevant to group buying.
What I want you to say is to establish a platform where recruiters seek cooperation with headhunters and give headhunters a certain discount. This is not theoretically analyzed, but from the actual operation experience, the listcv has done such a thing before. I also participated in the launch. The launch service providers not only have Headhunting companies, but also consultants and employees in the workplace. I did not understand it.
I think the most important thing is that headhunting should do a good job, and a lot of information should be transferred between the recruiters and recruiters. To put it bluntly, most of the possible reasons for unsmooth recruitment are poor information communication, especially the transmission of superior information of recruiters and poor feedback from the talent market information to the decision-making layer of recruiters. That is to say, the recruiter is a Taurus, but most job seekers only think of it as an ordinary company. Or, in the eyes of most suitable talents, the recruiter is just an ordinary company, however, recruiters want to hire people at a bid price.
In the past, I thought that there was too little communication between companies and headhunting consultants in the platform mode, or that there was too little communication between recruiters and consultants in the listcv mode, so the cooperation was not good.
In the future, HR and line manager can bypass headhunting in many places, and there are many free channels to publish information. Therefore, the probability of successful mode is very small.
But the last point is that if you are interested in a new task and the cost is low, you don't have to think about it. The best way is to do it right away! All low-cost and novel things do not need to be demonstrated. simply do it!