I dare say that IE7 RC1 is not as good as Firefox

Let's talk about IE7 RC1. As the RC version, the stability and functions are basically no different from the official version. Currently, only the English version is available. The interface and beta version do not change much. The address bar is on the top, and the menu bar is not displayed by default. All function buttons are placed in a special toolbar, which looks much refreshed. However, there is a serious usage problem. The "refresh" and "stop" buttons are placed behind the address bar, And the buttons such as "home page" and "option" are placed at the end of the tab bar, the search bar also appears behind the address bar. There is a problem here. Even if you close "lock the taskbar", these buttons still cannot change the location and cannot be removed from the search bar. I am not used to it anyway. Especially after I installed googletoolbar, the search bar is still in that position, and Mircosoft is a little too popular in promoting live search. In addition, after I maximize IE7 on a 19-inch wide screen, the button bar behind the tab bar still occupies 1/4 of the space. After switching to the screen at, it is estimated that the length will be larger. In view of this, the label bar of IE7 is doing well, the label will automatically adjust the size according to the quantity, and also provides a function called Quick tabs, which can tile all labels and thumbnails, easy to browse. The most important thing is that IE7 has excellent compatibility. At least all the plug-ins I use can continue to use without any compatibility issues. The plug-in of network banking is a little uncomfortable. Generally, the plug-in of network banking will modify the Security Settings of IE. When no default settings are used for the security settings of IE7, a prompt will appear.

Let's talk about Firefox. There are two simple points: Open Source and standards. This article focuses on these two points. As users, especially the vast majority of computers in China, are not very well-used. Therefore, these two points are not important for users who are harassed by IE rogue plug-ins. Even their knowledge of Firefox is not as powerful as they are; however, for a serious developer, these two points are indeed crucial, and everyone understands that I am not talking much about them. No one is upset when I see ie's messy non-W3C standards; let's talk about something else. What is a serious developer? For example, the authors of the 4832 toolbar, The ennic English online toolbar, and the dog search toolbar. Firefox is hard to rape ...... It turns out that the original rogue head has to be fake. Now, I want to put an extension on the Internet and ask the user to install it. By the way, apart from thunder, I just put the extension plug-in locally and directly.

Then let's talk about IE7 and Firefox. The native is that Firefox, which has no extensions, has been used by everyone, and the Native IE has also been used, firefox and IE have basically no advantages over ie, especially IE7. However, there are already thousands of Firefox extensions, and there are no less than 10 different extensions for one email notification. IE is also good in China, and the tool bar has been around for over a hundred minutes, however, ie is just a tool bar, and plug-ins of other classes are basically rare. Simply put, there are 155 names in the latest rogue plug-in List of super rabbit in the IE tool bar, not to mention whether it is accurate or inaccurate. More than half of the hundreds of plug-ins of IE are hooligans.

For IE7, this label is quite comfortable now, And quicktabs is quite fresh. It's better than Firefox, right, but Firefox is too simple to implement this function, if your tab browsing plug-in is updated one day, this function may be available. The other functions of IE7 are the same. Firefox does not need to be changed, so you can simply extend the update. This is the difference between open-source and non-open-source. There is a huge difference in third-party support. If IE wants to add a function, it should be said that IE6's management add-on should generate an SP. In addition, Firefox already supports native SVG. In this way, it is very difficult to update IE functions frequently to catch up with Firefox.

Then, when we see this news on the W3C standard that "IE7 fully supports CSS standards and takes a few days", developers will not feel relaxed, not to mention Dom support. Now, even Ajax XMLHttpRequest has to judge the browser, so you will not feel relaxed.

It can be asserted that users who like to use Firefox seldom switch to IE because of the release of IE7, but users who use IE switch to Firefox for various reasons. In China, I am sure that the number of Windows XP users who can update IE7 will not exceed 50%. Do not believe it? We can analyze that there are 0.2 billion million Internet users in China. conservatively, there are also 0.18 billion of Internet users in Internet cafes. I don't think it's okay to update Internet Explorer to play games, basically, XP is used for 90%. Users of the 98 series and other operating systems will be split out and cannot install IE7. There are about 0.1 billion people left. I bet that the Internet access level of 50% of users is quite low, and they stay at the level of online games and QQ, that is, those who are listed as the main target of harassment by rogue software, it is not sensitive to IE7. Even if it is sensitive, it may not have the ability to crack genuine verification, although it is very simple. For the remaining 50%, IE7 is not installed.

I have to admit that in order to popularize and occupy the market for a software, the most important thing in China is to catch up with the cracked version and number calculator. You should never be complicated in encryption, or you should never be sure that it will be useless, one way out for sharing software is to update the computer synchronously, and understand what is going on.

In this case, IE7 is compatible, which means that it is very easy for rogue leaders to rape IE7 ......