Let's talk about the understanding of "learning is a tough job, you have to stop, and you want to stick to your own business. People need to be good or bad -- Look at software development from a negative term ".

I read the article "learn to be easy-looking, do to stop, want to stick to your own seal, people should be good or bad-look at software development from a derogatory term", and I can't help but say something.

Since it is necessary to refute it, it is inevitable that the article will have a fire smell. In order to get rid of this taste, I would like to tell you a little joke, as the beginning of this article.

Joke:
Once, a speaker stressed the disadvantages of alcohol and tried to advise everyone to stop drinking. After doing an experiment, he put a worm in the water. The worm was very good, and then put the worm in alcohol, as a result, the bug was killed by alcohol. When the speaker saw the result, he was very happy and asked the audience what the problem was about the experiment? As a result, a person raised his hand and said, "This experiment shows that we have no bugs in our stomachs after drinking.

Although it is a joke, it tells us this truth. If I want you to understand a topic, you have to understand it in the opposite direction, we cannot achieve effective communication.

The author elaborated on four points of view in "learning must be a little eye-catching, stopping must be done, and sticking to your own seal; whether people must be good or bad -- looking at software development from a derogatory term:

1.Easy to learn

2.Do not stop

3.Self-sealing

4.People must be good or bad.

Here are four points of view. I will analyze and discuss them in depth. Since I have posted my post on the blog homepage, I should bear the consequences of misleading my thoughts.

1. What do you need to learn?

I personally think that Chen Peng's meaning is somewhat extreme. Learning is always a new kind of knowledge, but it does not mean that we should be highly educated. I believe that the law of the second Eight is a very useful law, especially in learning. For example, you can think back to what we have learned. Generally, 80% of new knowledge is what we have mastered, and 20% of new knowledge is what we have not mastered, if we do not have 80% of the already mastered knowledge to pave the way, it is very difficult for us to grasp the new 20% of the knowledge. That is to say, if we give you 100% of the unmastered new knowledge, it is difficult for you to learn and master, so learning also has a gradual process. For another example, why do we need to learn English step by step? Is there 20% of new words in the new text of the teacher that we have not mastered, however, we have mastered 80% of the words, used 80% of the words to guess what the words we don't understand mean, and gradually developed our potential. Through continuous intensive training, make English learners form conditioned reflections on English. Through this step-by-step learning, we learned English in the fastest and most effective way. If your English level has not reached the level 1 level, give you 8 levels of English for you to learn, even if there is the best teacher in the world to teach you, i'm afraid the learning efficiency is also very low. At this time, 99% of your input is invalid.

We usually have four levels of learning:
1. read ten thousand books.

2. There are thousands of miles.

3. There are countless readers.

4. Famous teacher enlightened.

First, we read a lot of books and learned a lot through various school education (this is the first stage-reading a thousand books ). After graduation, we set foot on another way to study. When we enter an enterprise to study, some people may have questions about how the Enterprise will study. I will explain briefly, in fact, an enterprise is a university without walls, and we are also being educated and trained by the enterprise. In the past few years, a person may always go back and forth between enterprises or even cities (so we entered the second stage-traveling the miles ). Through years of training in schools, enterprises, and society, we have been in contact with all kinds of people. Every day, we are dealing with different people, so our vision begins to expand, we learned a very important skill in Human Growth-recognizing people (so we entered the third stage with countless readers ). After the third stage, we found that no matter how hard we work, there are still too many confusions. We will always face some bottlenecks in our life and work. What should we do, at this time, someone needs to give us some advice and give us wisdom, so we begin to enter the fourth stage (teacher enlightened ). The four courses, including reading a thousand books, traveling a thousand miles, reading countless people, and understanding of famous teachers, are generally carried out from low to high, and may also be cross-cutting. Without the first three stages, even if there is a teacher enlightened, it is useless, because your brain input is too small, and how the teacher enlightened you, it is impossible to produce too much output. So in this case, there is: The Master leads the door, practice in the ancient saying.

Conclusion: learning should be gradual and never outshine.

2. Do you have to stop?

In fact, the readers may find out if this absurd question is true or not. If the question stops, Which of the following is the country's richest people? Where is social development? Where is social progress? How can the software industry make great progress and development?

We do agree that we should not blindly seek new technologies, mainly based on the following situations:

1. You have not been able to control it. If you cannot control it, blind use of new technologies may be like giving you a new weapon, instead of hitting the enemy, but hurting yourself.

2. New technologies may not be the best and most suitable technology in some companies.

3. New technologies are also accompanied by new risks. Many companies have strict risk control and are unwilling to introduce new technologies blindly. At this time, companies tend to hold a wait-and-see attitude towards new technologies. But it does not mean that the company does not pay attention to new technologies. I think they will consider the right time.

3. Do you want to fix it?

No matter how far-fetched your explanation is, I can tell you that it is absolutely only a dead end. The problem is indeed a problem, but it is the responsibility of no one who can escape it. Maybe some problems cannot be changed. It is always better to change and improve or not. Since you stick to it, you should not solve the problem. What you say and what you do cannot be consistent with your words and deeds.

4. Are people good or bad?

An undeniable fact: For a Manager, the ability to distinguish between right and wrong should be the first, the second, and the third. For a leader, the ability to distinguish between right and wrong is simply rejected, so the leader starts to be good or bad. What can be imagined about this team? As the saying goes, good people will deal with good people. Bad people often gather together with bad people. Why do we say that the red ink and the black ink are near Zhu Zhe? The evil horse in the team must be removed as soon as possible. Otherwise, the development will only harm the entire team. Some people may say that not all kinds of people in the company need it? What sort of Buffalo, Fox, dog, and so on constitute the Office ecosystem. I have no objection to this sentence, but it does not mean that good or bad are both good and evil. The composition of the entire ecosystem is divided by ability and human characteristics, rather than by quality.

Conclusion:

There are usually many types of articles on the homepage of the blog Park. The most common types of articles are technical and conceptual articles. If something technical is wrong, the severity is not very high, because people are capable of self-correction. Besides, the technical errors on the homepage of the blog garden will be corrected as soon as possible, what you read is what affects your life. There is a theory in psychology that the subconscious of a person's brain has no ability to distinguish. If you say more, he will believe it. Some wrong ideas pose great harm to readers. If you insist on understanding and applying the wrong viewpoint, it will actually become: "mistakes take ignorance as a personality ". And I have seen too many people make mistakes. Ignorance is a personality, wrong is so resolute, wrong is so taken for granted. I would like to remind you not to take ignorance as your personality. Only as a reminder. Do not use the correct Sn.

It should be a counterargument. It is hard to grasp the words. I also try to make the article less medicinal. If you have any disrespect for the original author, please forgive me. Please believe that I am not malicious.

Summary and reflection:

After reading the comments of golden ocean (jyk), I have also earnestly tasted and reflected on my own behavior. Why are I always too clear about and wrong points, contradictions ...... When we were young, we were always competitive. When we were young, we often competed with our children. As a result, we won, and the children won't play with us. When we went to school to compete with our teachers, we won, teachers do not like us anymore. When we grow up, we compete with our girlfriends, and we win our girlfriends. When we compete with our bosses at work, we win, as a result, the boss told us to leave. When we went to the blog Park to compete, we won. As a result, our friends in the blog garden were no longer friends. Therefore, in most cases, you must master your work. I prefer to be a person who will let others like me. It seems that you should pay more attention to it in the future. Sometimes, in some cases, winning means both losing and losing means winning. Academic Debate is always filled with a strong smell of gunpowder, which is too difficult to grasp.