The second stage of the sprint is over, our software has been embryonic, along with the Alpha version and beta release, our software has entered the school market, in the process we get a lot of feedback, these comments and suggestions are very real, the mention is also in place, we will continue to improve in the late , strive for perfection, real to market. After such a long period of effort, the team should also have a performance assessment, so this performance evaluation for the second sprint stage and the release phase of the overall performance evaluation.
This performance assessment uses a percentile quantitative approach to each member's performance assessment, which, based on the characteristics of our team, uses a personalized performance assessment methodology to consider each member:
1. Achievement of objectives (consideration of gaps in achievement of planned goals, 20 points)
2.UI Design (UI design is most directly reflected in the user's use, 15 points)
3. Functional design (15 points)
4. Workload (10 points)
5. Completion of timeliness (consider whether the team can complete 10 points according to the original plan)
6. Improve innovation (10 points)
7. Team awareness (5 points)
8. Blog summary (5 points)
9. Learning situation (5 points)
10 enthusiasm (5 points)
The performance evaluations of members are as follows:
Members \ Considerations |
Target implementation (20) |
UI Design (15) |
Functional Design (15) |
Workload (10) |
Timeliness of completion (10) |
Improving innovation (10) |
Team Awareness (5) |
Blog Summary (5) |
Learning Situation (5) |
Motivation (5) |
Score |
Song Hailin |
20 |
15 |
12 |
10 |
9 |
8 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
94 |
Yuhuihui |
18 |
13 |
12 |
9 |
8 |
8 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
87 |
Jia Chao Model |
19 |
12 |
15 |
10 |
9 |
9 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
93 |
Zhangjiangpeng |
17 |
12 |
13 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
5 |
4 |
5 |
5 |
84 |
Performance evaluation in the second sprint stage