The general knowledge of some common diseases is described in chapters. In line with the title of the book only two sections, respectively, the cold and shoulder weeks to be certified dead can be good.
The author is a domestic relatively early mention of cervical erosion is not a disease of professionals. Fatty liver is not afraid is also the author many years ago began to say the point.
After reading the feeling is not rigorous. For example, the author mentioned that 1/3 of the disease is dead can be good, 1/3 of the disease doctors can cure, the remaining 1/3 is not good. This seems to be the author's head shot out, did not give any data sources.
When it comes to fatty liver, it is also a matter of case, to cite the experiments that have not been published in academia, and not to mention the general views of the academic community, which I think is the author's homework when he wrote the book.
With regard to the relationship between cervical cancer and HPV, the author's knowledge seems outdated. What I've seen so far is that several subtypes of HPV are associated with cervical cancer, and other HPV subtypes have nothing to do with cervical cancer. In the book, the author says HPV infection can develop into cervical cancer infiltration after 10 years, without mentioning a few high-risk subtypes.
"Dead can be good disease" comprehensive medical science, content and title does not match, Samsung recommended