Rogue and scammers)

"An English major student and an English major teacher discuss professional mobile phone technology issues on Youku live ." "A crosstalk bully a digital-loving child ." "Apple and Samsung have won ." "I think this debate is about Youku. Are you not afraid of jokes when making live videos ?" "The mage should not be close to the warrior. You have just started with a spell, and people are ridiculed and lost. Then there is a continuous technique without the concept of cool-down time ." "Will you not interrupt me this time ?" "Wang Xiaobo once wrote that the core of his father's academic competition at that time was to eliminate the physical body and views. For example, if you are a reactionary school, You are a petty school, and your opinion is wrong ." "Hammer powder or the hammer powder, xiang fan or xiang fan ." ...... I believe that even if I haven't seen the Youku battle of Luo Yonghao's PK Wang ziru on the evening of August 27, the above wonderful comments are enough to cover most of the processes and content. Some people say that Luo Yonghao won. Before the bicker, the number of support for the two men was close to, while after the bicker, Luo Yonghao also ridiculed that it should be. Some people also say that although Wang freely knows that the crosstalk debate will inevitably fail, he also won through increased exposure. Of course, some people say that both of them have lost, and Youku has also lost. What exactly?

 

Let's start from Luo Yonghao's objective point of view. Actually, there are two chapters: My products are fine, and you have problems with Wang freely. There are three ways to prove that your product has no problems: 1. Your testing standards are not standardized; 2. Your testing quantity is too small and unfair; 3. The industry level is not surprising. Three tricks are also used to prove that Wang ziru has problems: sponsorship fee, consulting fee, and differential price fee. The first move in the first half of this chapter is of course Wang ziru's own problem. The test specification should have been made public. You can apply for patent protection, but it is not made public, someone will naturally think that you are differentiated. Second, the zealer was forced to buy a hammer to return to power, and the test conclusion was issued. (Wait, isn't Luo Yonghao always apologizing that the product cannot be purchased due to insufficient production capacity? Why can the zealer team buy 51 machines? Does this count as boosting hammer sales ?) When talking about the white balance of the camera, Luo Yonghao simply defended several servers that could not explain the problem and wanted to test dozens of them. It's hard to roll down the sleep. Should I buy dozens of machines at once to find one, or should I change one machine until I change it back? As a hammer powder, you will not be able to buy a good machine in the future. Don't blame others, just blame yourself for not feeling enough! In the third move, Apple and Samsung were the winners of the night. Luo Yonghao made a change to the old "best cell phone in the Eastern Hemisphere". Apart from Apple, Samsung did not meet the requirements for comparison machines, he has forgotten that the stick is actually in the eastern hemisphere. When you sell 3000 of mobile phones, do you have to compare them with 1699 of mobile phones? Nice? About the feeling of a hammer is like this: Spend 3000 to buy 1500 of the goods, and pretend to force people out of the door, ye has an identity, you fruit powder, one kidney for another machine, I have one kidney for two machines. The rogue is like this. You talk to him about the truth, he is playing with you, you are playing with him, he is talking to you about the law, you are talking to him about the law, he is talking to you about the policy, you told him about the policy, and he told you the truth. The three tricks that prove that Wang ziru has a problem in the second half of the chapter were caught off guard. I received sponsorship from four mobile phone manufacturers. It is said that I can buy back my shares in the future. Where are such good people? Four more! Even if there is no direct evidence, it is hard to convince that a third party is a third party. The charge for the consulting service is the second question of Luo Yonghao. SEALs I personally think that since Wang ziru's evaluation has been sought after by kol and many users in the industry, he must have a grounded experience and his unique insights on how to make a good mobile phone. Regardless of whether there is injustice or not, personal intellectual property rights are granted. Therefore, it is too common to collect information fees. What's more, unlike the evaluation, this is a willingness to fight and a willingness to endure. In light of the good relationship between Luo Yonghao and Wang ziru, he said that he was thin when he met each other. He couldn't help but think about Luo Yonghao's motivation and starting point for connecting Wang ziru's consulting fee. To make this article as objective as possible, I will not elaborate on it here. The last parts to be repaired come from Huaqiang north water instead of the original Factory goods. It can be said that Luo Yonghao promised not to mention the matter beforehand, and broke his promise on the same day. It can be said that the profit of the goods without telling the user and the price difference is a violation of the right to know. It can be said that it does not matter if it is not affected. But in short, the reason for these three moves is that Luo Yonghao has stolen the concept, and you have a problem with Wang ziru. Therefore, there is a problem with your opinion, so you have a bad hammer, this set of primary school principles described by Wang Xiaobo, just as Fang zhouzi said that your Korean article is written by someone else, just as you can whitewash your own transgenic stains. In the same sense, we only analyze Luo Yonghao's violation of the common sense of debate. This does not mean that the hammer is hacked or not hacked. Let's take a look at Wang ziru. because there are too few speeches and OK accounts for almost half of them, we can't sum up anything. A large box was prepared to estimate a pile of evidence and precision instruments, but apparently the live broadcasting room was not a lab. When talking about the visual angle of the three mobile phones, I was still looking for a prepared article and reading the word "I see what this article says", which is really ridiculous. Judging from experience, the brightness is indeed very different from the visual limit angle, but most of the visible angles in the middle have very little difference. Compared with the obvious difference in the display graph, you can ignore it. If you are able to splash like my seals, your face will pass over: Didn't you say your cell phone is the best? Where can I prove that your hammer is the best in the eastern hemisphere? Where do you know that you cannot help us with the wall! Afterwards, @ Wang freely zealer and @ zealer apart from providing a hammer drop and discharge test report, there was no movement, while @ Luo Yonghao tried to forward it to the hammer powder point of view every day, speak out for yourself and make a mocking effort. This is the difference between reason and sensibility. In fact, Wang freely should be more calm. What's wrong with taking money? Which Kol is not provided by the manufacturer? If there is no manufacturer to support the service, how many gifts does Kol have to surprise SF? The success of a scammers lies not in the value of money, but in the trust of others. Finally, we will discuss the organizer Youku. Obviously, this is a great opportunity for Youku. by cutting the live video into thirteen paragraphs, we can fully see that Youku is ready to pay for it. However, Youku underestimated its attention that night and kept choppy, making it difficult to sit down on the united front and sit down on Youku. From the PK process, Youku is more amateur. There must be rules for the debate first, and no host exists. The time for both parties to speak was too time-consuming. To prove that Wang freely makes mistakes on other issues, it means that he is not objective to treat the hammer. It is a more obvious concept of stealing and changing, but there is no guidance. Maybe Youku is eager to create chaos, which leads to speculation in the future. Some people say that Luo Yonghao has good debate skills. He has gained the upper hand in such a non-rule and non-differential debate, and Luo Yonghao posted gold to himself (Weibo claims that he wins the truth, not the skill ), in fact, where is the skill, it is to face it without the rules of the game.
At this point, seals have made an objective comment as much as possible from the point of view not mentioned by others. In fact, this is only the comments on the site. The four good people who lie down on the site and the other major factories that did not involve this matter are not described in detail due to the length of the article. A friendly reminder is that after a grain breaks through the consumer-dominated consumption situation, mobile consumers are increasingly concerned about third-party evaluation, and now it is in the second stage, that is, potential rules in the industry have been exposed, do consumers continue to pay attention to third parties, or do manufacturers come up with any other new tricks? Http://www.myzte.cn/thread-186945-1-1.html

Rogue and scammers)