The first thing we feel is that it is very easy to use!
I think it is the most convenient texture function.Now:
- You do not need to upload images one by one. Once published, all the images pasted in wlw have been uploaded and configured. It's really convenient!
- Allows you to directly import clipboard textures.This is very convenient. In combination with my faststone capture, I basically want to cut a picture and paste it in. It is the same operation process as in word: press Ctrl + printscr to select a region, and then press Ctrl + V in the editor. This is awesome!
In addition, the style control has been quite detailed, basically what the editor looks like and what it looks like.
However, the style is compared carefully and several inconsistencies are found.:
- TestArticleI used a <br> tag in the editor. The string that I directly entered in the editor does not use escape characters, and the result is a line break (I suspect other labels are the same, I don't know if this is related to the characteristics of the blog service provider. I can test it in detail later)
- When you set the number and project symbol in the editor, you cannot see the number and project symbol, but you only find that the indentation has changed. However, both of them will be sent to the blog.
- The number of characters in a row. The wlw editor is inconsistent with the actual output width. (This may not be a problem with wlw. I found that both the browser and wlw can Ctrl + scroll to adjust the visual size of the text, this feature may affect the final row text capacity in the browser and the wlw)
- There is a GIF image. When I paste it in the wlw, It is the default size of the source image.
Finally, by the way, I used the wlw version:
I use the portable version, which is the portable version. (I like to find the portable software, such as Firefox, TC, editplus, and so on, and configure it, and then put it on my mobile phone for use with the copy. In this way, it is very convenient to follow the profile. Of course, there is also a more convenient form of automatic synchronization over the Internet, such as Foxmarks)
This is the case with my portable version...
- I first downloaded the portable version II provided by Leo.
- Then, I deleted the wlw package 12.0.1277.816 in the app directory. (I'm not sure if this is the latest version, so I am still planning to re-release the new version from live)
- Next, we installed the latest wlw online on live (later we checked that the version is 14.0.8064.206)
Then, according to techlifeweb, even the wlw of this installation version has never been run, and the C: /program files/files in Windows Live/writer can be copied to Windows livewriter in a portable version of the app.
- Now, I'm going to test it...
This is listed here because some of the problems listed above may be related to my use of portable.
In addition, I have not tried: If I have uninstalled the installation version, will this portable version be used differently.
Try it later...
