The evaluation of the web in the path of software innovation.

Mass of Web Hysteria <?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "Urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"/>

The World Wide Web has opened up the awesome resources of the Internet to everyone, as long as they have a computer and a modem. Wide The Web is a great tool, and it offers wonderful value. Surprisingly, the most important change the web makes is showing how easy it is to use the software. Many former defenders have discovered that the use of the web is fairly simple, and that all of the software industries they use effortlessly should be so easy. In particular, they like the way browsers work, and it does not lead people to the annoying installation process.

Software managers, especially the company's it suppliers, are always enthusiastic about jumping onto popular floats. They also love and captivate browser-based software because they don't have to let users take on the hateful installation process to make their products debut. Before the web, all software products require a complex installation process, while a product running in a browser does not have to. For most software executives, this seems like a technological leap beyond the invention of zippers.

But it's just a scam. There is no reason why any non-web program cannot have a completely invisible installation process, regardless of its technical details. If your computer requires a software installation, it needs to be installed with a browser or without a browser. The only reason why non-browser programs need to be installed is that programmers often do their job in this way. Putting a series of questions in the installer will make it easier for them to work on the program. Early browsers had no facilities to ask for these questions, so the programmer had to shrug their shoulders and stop asking them. If further proof of this need, programmers will hardly notice this retrogression, but for many users this makes the Web the easiest platform they have ever used.

Put the installation aside and the browser is as vulnerable as a kitten. The idiomatic grammar of their interaction has a historical background. Their architecture is primitive jokes, and they snap as easily as icicles. Any program that runs in a browser should inevitably sacrifice a huge amount of performance. The way the software manager makes me angry, they are enthusiastic about opening up the core of their application (translation is problematic.) And just say to the developer, "Please get out of the installation process." "There are no installed products, and by turning to the web there is no installation benefit."

Users require browser-based software because they don't know anything that will be better for him. But the rationale for software developers walking in this direction is completely wrong. The web organization is like a centralized group that controls the action of an inefficient left machine through a central computer command. Programmers, especially those in the corporate IT department, have a central computer, so stick to these steps as a vested interest in the group. Instead of free access to the benefits of no installer, users pay a great price and lose long-term control of their information infrastructure.