The impact of an aircraft on a space star is a brutal action that may cause a fatal disaster to humans.

The "Wanderer" and "intelligent No. 1" selected the "impact" option ".

The scientific value of impact is very limited. No matter how Mars and the Moon have been logged on by detectors, it is possible to collect all kinds of data in a more peaceful and friendly way; and our earth scientists, but chose the most "brutal" approach-impact.

Assume that the target star has a life --

Humans have not found life in stars other than the Earth, but they do not mean no life. At least they cannot deny the possibility of existence. In front of the Universe, humans are too small, human cognition is too small, and there are too many things to learn. A group of people are happy to boast about how advanced science is today. I don't understand why there are so many other things that cannot be explained "scientifically" by "science?

Assume that the target star has a life --

If this is not enough, the impact of human beings may cause them, no, and they may cause a disaster. Don't forget how dinosaurs on our planet went extinct.

If there is enough wisdom in this life, they have reason to believe that the impact of humans is a malicious provocation against them, an invasion of their planet, and they will inevitably rise up against it --

If this wisdom is far greater than that of humans, I am sorry, the earth on which we live will become a nebula, and it will be scattered in the universe ......
If this wisdom is far inferior to humans and cannot compete with those on Earth, and some of them are lucky enough to save it, they will keep it forever until one day ......
If this wisdom is the same as that of humans, then the real "Star Wars" begins ......

 

Whether it's a delusion or a worry, the fact that the impact on the planet is a "brutal" undoubtedly proves that humans-at least some of them-are brutal. Brutal humans will sooner or later pay the appropriate price for such "barbaric.