User Experience Design Analysis: A copy of punctuation experience

I received an email alert from my neighbour (Wealink) and told me I had a new email.
Landed in a look, oh yes, the ad Mail said.

After deleting the message.
See the top of a small message: "New features travel."

Glancing at the past, a little puzzled, and then swept back a look, "new features on business"?
What do you mean, shrimp? New features "How Can" travel?

Think carefully, oh, originally should be:"new function: Travel"!

Even if you add a punctuation mark, it will make people smooth.

Think about it: does this not exactly cause my concern? It just worked.
But the idea doesn't stand up to thinking:
One, more sensitive to copywriting should be counted as a minority.
Second, in fact, in the blue as the basis for the color of the page on the orange hint of the message has been more conspicuous, there is no need to do some hands and feet on the copy.
Third, even if the intention to arouse the user's attention, but it also does not have a positive effect on this function, but it is easy to cause misunderstanding. The function is for the human, at this time, the experience is more than the trick.

Finally said back:
It's hard for me to believe that people who design websites are so troublesome to think in such a small place,
More likely to be inadvertently overlooked a small detail.

Very boring, wrote a diary.
Share a link: Inspirational brother, this is also a realm
I'm sweating a pain, the contrast is a little bit big.