Which is better for SolidWorks and ProE?

I believe that the students who have studied mechanical design know that SolidWorks and ProE two software, SolidWorks and ProE are now widely used in three-dimensional design software, there are many similar features in the function, but the features, then the two software that better use it, The following small series simply summed up the SW and ProE 10 different places.

1.SOLIDWORKS focuses on mechanical structure design; ProE focuses on mold and surface design.

2.SOLIDWORKS support Chinese; ProE does not support Chinese folder and Chinese input.

3.SOLIDWORKS has a perfect help system, in the use of problems encountered in the Help system can search for answers; ProE is a lot of tricks, but it doesn't help the system, so the learning cycle is longer.

4.SOLIDWORKS Parent-child Relationship and association feature are not very strict, and no datum is needed when sketching; ProE father and son relations and related characteristics are more rigorous, the drafting must have a benchmark;

The intersecting contours and open sketch outlines in 5.SOLIDWORKS sketches can be stretched into solids; ProE can not be realized temporarily;

The 6.SOLIDWORKS can be rotated and moved directly opposite to the entity, ProE temporarily cannot be implemented.

7.SOLIDWORKS System option interface is simple and intuitive; ProE is relatively cumbersome, ProE learning is a major difficulty, but also a major weakness of the software.

8.SOLIDWORKS or more color method to handle the thread, simple image; ProE must be completely drawn, the thread features are more complex to occupy more memory, large assemblies in the number of threads will affect the system operating speed.

9.SOLIDWORKS can copy the parts directly in the assembly; The ProE needs to be re-entered.

10.SOLIDWORKS provides a rich right-click function, usually the design of the most required commands to click on the right button can be found; ProE's right-click function is relatively simple, affecting the design efficiency of the promotion.

SolidWorks is focused on enhancing software functionality, innovating, and delivering the best product performance, which is easily reflected in SolidWorks ' growth data. SolidWorks ' easy to learn and use is unmatched by ProE,

Small series more recommended SolidWorks OH

1. Easy to learn and use is one of the important pointers for choosing CAD software. Based on this philosophy, SolidWorks has developed CAD software that is as easy to operate as windows as an operating platform and windows, and because of this foundation there are a number of Windows operating functions and features that are cleverly integrated into SolidWorks operations, like the usual use of Windows software. For example, in Word to "move" and "copy" the text to another location, you can use the very familiar window icon directive: "Cut", "copy" and then "paste". You can also use CTRL + C or CTRL + V to "copy" or "move" to a new location. SolidWorks allows this handy technique to be used throughout the system, where users can "copy", "Paste" or "drag" to the desired location, as if using Word or Excel

Simple and convenient. Users in SolidWorks can use the "drag-and-drop" operation feature to quickly copy or move features such as fillets, "remove" (holes), and "filler elongation" to another new location. Users can use this method of operation across different files, even through the Internet can do such operations. The easy-to-use features of SolidWorks allow users to focus on design work rather than focus on learning how to manipulate software. These familiar and easy-to-use operations are not entirely available in the wildfire version of pro/e (not to mention in the previous version), although some operations are typically window operated but these operations still have a large number of uses such as drop-down menus (menus), or must be selected through multiple mouse clicks to achieve the goal. PRO/E was originally built on UNIX systems, although PTC tried to make PRO/E's wildfire version easy to learn and use like a window, but wildfire is just a user interface imitation

Windows is really a window interface, but only a few features support such operations, so pro/e users will have to learn two different interface: one is the old drop-down menu, one is the operation of the window. So there are more and more pro/e users prefer to use CAD software like SolidWorks, which is as simple as window operations.

2. SolidWorks has more development potential and complete solutions

Another important factor to consider: The company's sound finances will enable users to use design tools without worries. The financial reports announced from SolidWorks appear to be growing every year regardless of income or number of units, especially since SolidWorks joined Dassault Systèmes (Dassault Systemes) to obtain additional technical support from Dassault Systèmes.

3. SolidWorks has been ranked 3D software leader

Users should consider what design tools to use for developing their next-generation products, as well as easy training to effectively improve their efficiency. SolidWorks has become a leader in 3D design software very quickly, and now more than 380,000 users have chosen SolidWorks as their design tool. In fact, the tools used by SolidWorks are much faster than any 3D product, and their annual sales are almost twice times more than pro/e. From the last five years, PTC's market share has been gradually replaced by SolidWorks. This is very important, because a set of software needs to be able to sustain the increase depends on the cost of new sales and maintenance, and when these two important sources of income decline will make it necessary to enhance the software functionality required to be affected, of course, the relative will make its competitiveness decline; we can get from pro/e Version 20 to the current wildfire version of this five years only a small increase in the function of the clues. PTC is now looking to the launch of the wildfire version can stop the trend of sales decline, but in the current situation seems to still have a lot of difficulties.

Of course, the above is only representative of small personal views, only in the actual application can better find the advantages and disadvantages of each software oh.