Chatting with a new employee, he responded to a question: He has always worked overtime recently, and working overtime is not finished, instead, the testing work often starts from the off-duty time. He worries about problems, so he has to stay with him. He thinks this is too bad. In fact, it is really bad. This is a problem.
Before responding to his questions, I asked a few questions: Are there any reasons for the problem? He gave me an answer. I know that his answer has a lot of defects. It doesn't matter. This is mainly because of the asymmetry between him and me. I went on to ask: Have you ever communicated with your supervisor about this problem? The answer is no. I will ask again: How do you think the problem should be solved? He barely answered. After asking these questions, I basically decided that he was a "problem maker ". Then I further explored and asked him how familiar he was with the project he took over. His answer showed that he was still at the tip of the iceberg. I asked him where the time went. He told him that he was studying the underlying framework of the system and even included some new technologies.
So far, I am almost full of sweat-he is not only a problem maker, but also a person who does not use time.
In my impression, a good professional is a group of people who are upright, agile, and good at completing tasks with the team. During their work, they can discover problems anytime and anywhere. Then they can take the initiative to analyze the cause of the problem and quickly grasp the essence of the problem. Then, they begin to think about how to deal with it, start to sort out possible solutions ABC and analyze the advantages and disadvantages of each solution. Although there are several solutions, they also give their preferred opinions on a specific solution. Finally, they not only brought problems, but also started to knock on the boss's door with solutions. The boss was very grateful, with a big wave, and wrote a huge deal on the ABC they provided, at the same time, the boss quietly and generously added points to these excellent partners, because they are the "problem solver ".
If one day you find that there is a kind of person around you, they are not as good as you in terms of skills, but they get a promotion opportunity and get a salary increase quota, before you complain that Bole is dead, think about who is more like a "problem solver". If the answer is you, I suggest you change your job immediately or contact me directly, I will sell you a good price. If the conclusion is that although their skills are not as good as you, they ask Grandpa and Grandma to solve the problems you can easily solve, in addition, each time you get your first. This indicates that it is time to review yourself. It is time to make some changes and you cannot sleep on the "superb technical capabilities. We should be able to find that technology is just a tool, and its own value is limited, almost negligible, until we do something with the starting head-someone uses it to hit the nail, some people use it for Gold Rush and others use it for robbery. The benefits may vary widely.
Back to the above case, if we only find the problem and do not go deep, this original positive effort will stay at the "complaint" level, and then basically no one cares. Even more amazing, we spent a lot of time studying the ingredients in the headers-or you're thinking, maybe I know the ingredients in the headers, I admit it will help, but do you know how much opportunity cost we have to pay in the middle? Will the problem be escalated accidentally, from a simple level of "familiar with projects" to a high level of "can I show my competency during the trial period, in the end, I don't know how I died. Why ?! Finally, you finally "understand" the original "leaders are dummies" and "Bole is dead ".
I'm afraid he doesn't understand it, so I will give him an example. I say that if you want your wife to cook a delicious meal, then you call your wife and say, "dear, have a good evening. "You are expecting to arrive home from work. A big table of delicious food is waiting for you. Your wife said that she is very tired today. "Good food" becomes a problem. You want your wife to solve this problem. She is tired and doesn't want to cook. This is a new problem, now the key is who will become the problem solver? If my wife is tired but still makes a table for you, the wife is the problem solver. After enjoying the perfect food, your wife said, today is actually very tired, even if you are a piece of wood, i'm also touched. If you think your wife is really tired, and you are considerate of the wife's hard work, you give your wife an idea and propose to have a good meal out, sir is the problem solver, my wife will be grateful for your understanding. In short, the problem Releaser can always win extra points for himself. Of course, there is another situation, that is, when my wife went to the vegetable market to buy food and found that the price of pork rose, she called you and asked if she wanted to buy it. What did you say about the price increase, I still care about the little money, so I said "buy". The phone is not long before, and it's ringing again. My wife said "buy grass eggs or foreign eggs". You can say anything. When you just wanted to call the phone, my wife asked again, how many eggs do you want to buy today? I think if you haven't crashed, you're a hero. Or you are already considering whether to hire a household administrator.
If the above principles can be accepted, a very common question will have a very good answer: Why is technology the same? Everyone can earn n more in a month, and you can only take a poor fraction? The value of success depends on the value of solving the problem, achieving small success in solving small problems, and achieving great success in solving big problems-those who use their field knowledge solved the "big problem ", these problems have produced great value after they are solved. They just get the part they deserve.
So what is our career? It is to train itself to continuously solve the "bigger problem. Therefore, from this perspective, all the time and energy you spend in this process are probably not for others, even if you "work overtime ", probably, you cannot simply think about "Exploitation. As long as we have the thinking of the problem solver, we can become a person who sees and loves people. At that time, the whole world was happy. At the same time, if bole can do one thing in addition to discovering the horse, I would rather believe that it will provide all possible resources to help the horse improve its ability to "solve problems, achieve the team's goals on this basis. This is a benign interaction. In the interaction process, people are thriving and the financial resources are rolling in.
Reference address: http://blog.ppcode.com/article/Work/705.html