You don't need a knife to kill a chicken or a scissors to kill a cow.

On the homepage of the past two days, the post-doctoral and migrant workers' differences have attracted the attention of many people, the author, Ji Yu, then published the story "", and Lao Zhao also wrote the story about postdoctoral and migrant workers. aaron looked at him and he looked at him and said that he had some opinions on the small work that he was looking. Aaron took a closer look and found that the employee's practice is very similar to the chicken knife that he used now. However, Aaron is dedicated to thinking about how to use it to kill cattle in the future, so I jumped out to defend my "grassroots pragmatism.

In a word, I will summarize the story: A small worker in a township enterprise used a fan to solve the problem of using high technology to filter empty soap boxes. For this story, Aaron's opinion is that township enterprises should use small workers and Unilever should use post-doctoral programs.

Aaron said that the small company's method of using small workers is appropriate, and Unilever's method of using post-doctoral posts is also appropriate, but it is not necessarily appropriate after the change: small and Medium-sized Enterprises in villages and towns use post-doctoral approaches to make a fuss. Maybe their profits for one month are not enough for the post-doctoral salaries. In turn, it would not be appropriate for Unilever to use small jobs, after all, the post-doctoral method is more accurate, and the probability of errors is also small. Aaron thinks that Unilever should sell an empty box to make public opinions lose more than 100,000 of the mess.

This story reminds Aaron-Aaron that he has always believed in pragmatism. I personally think that pragmatism is enough and will continue to improve. In one breath, we cannot eat the next fat man. We can only do enough at the beginning. Lao Zhao said that he does not like "It's easy to implement for beginners. I don't want to talk much about the code." This is understandable. This is the environment where Lao Zhao is located (including his own capabilities). However, you should think that this piece of code that can be implemented by a beginner is still very useful. If a beginner sees the code that can be implemented, he is very happy. For a beginner, it is the most exciting to write and let him see the Hello world code. After all, he "will, this is easier to stimulate the interest of beginners than to teach him a lot about programming ideas first.

Aaron is currently engaged in testing. many colleagues in the industry know that testing started late in China and is still lagging behind in development. However, in recent years, many small companies have begun to introduce testers. Aaron himself is in this environment. The only difference is that we have developed development and testing in parallel since the beginning. Aaron found in his own practice that the best is not necessarily suitable for him, so Aaron began to promote his "grassroots pragmatism ". When Aaron started the test, there was not much information about the test on the network, and the form content was probably something like a template, or a well-known automated testing tool's usage skills, of course, at that time there were some related classical books, such as Ron Patton, which Aaron had always admired, software testing. Unfortunately, Aaron found that he had read so many test plan templates but still could not find the focus of the test. After a bunch of plans, he could not keep up with the changes, later, Aaron began to split up those classic things, practice them step by step, and make a test plan that is sufficient, the test scheduler section is kicked out of the test plan document when you have no control over the schedule. In short, "Enough is enough ".

At this point, many people think that Aaron is here to refute "The difference between post-doctoral studies and migrant workers". Then we should continue to read it with patience. I don't know whether Aaron is enough or not. It is very important to note that "+ continues to improve" is followed by "+. From this point of view, Lao Zhao does not like "I Am a beginner and can achieve it. I don't want to talk much about it. I may be a bit angry about the code, after all, these people are suspected of bringing bad habits. Aaron found that he had accumulated some experience while insisting on "enough", so Aaron thought about whether to do something else, at this time, Aaron began to think about the previously removed parts and then add them a little bit-this is the so-called continuous progress.

Aaron has his own reasons for doing this: the practice of small workers is simple, saving the trouble for the township enterprises, but if "accidentally" the enterprise becomes Unilever, at this time, it would be inappropriate to use a small employee. Advanced technology is not necessarily the most suitable for you, But advanced technology must be better than your own method. You do not need a knife to kill chickens, nor do you need scissors to kill cows. Or you should say, "kill cows cannot use scissors." This means you have to consider that you are dealing with chickens all the time while preparing to kill them, in the future, it will not be necessary. Therefore, we must learn how to kill a calf with a knife, and when a ox finally appears in front of itself, you can use a cow to solve the problem as quickly as you did in the previous year.

 

PS: I read Lao Zhao's book "I don't know how to do it." I finally understood why Lao Zhao doesn't like other people to post code. You can check it out, aaron apologized for the possible misunderstanding of Lao Zhao in this article ~ In order not to mess up the homepage, Aaron should remove the article from the homepage.