git merge squash

ProblemIn the same document, when you submit, someone updates the file and uploads it earlier than you so that your local file is not up-to-date. Therefore, when you want to upload your own modified files, the first step of Git pull, the following error is reported: error: Your local changes to the following files would be overwritten by merge: src/test/resources/application_context.xml Ple

If there are some configuration files on the system that have been configured on the server and then later developed and then added some new configuration items, A code violation occurs when this profile is published: Error:your local changes to the following files would is overwritten by merge:protected/config/main.phpPlease, commit your changes or stash them before you can merge. If you want to keep the changes made on the production server, simp

Tags: Merge git checkout commit Git version 1.9.6 1. Create and delete branches 2. Create branches, merge branches, and delete branches 3. Create branch, git 3-way merge, and delete Branch

Background:Recent development needs, need another small partner Meien together to develop a project, the first time offsite and small partners to write code, Meien complete the project's other half, now I and Meien have written their own code, I need to merge the code, about git pull, merge, The push action records are as follows: 1,Meien operation : In the Mei

There are two kinds of git code merging: git merge, Git Rebase, actually the two commands do the same thing, it is to merge one branch into another branch, but its merging way is different. Git

Merge_result6 7 "C:\Program Files\sourcegear\common\diffmerge\sgdm.exe"" $"" $"" $"--result="$4"--title1="Mine"--title2="Merge"--title3="Theirs"Note: The path name is the actual pathname of the installed DiffMerge.exe, and the landlord is "C:/Program Files/sourcegear/common/diffmerge/sgdm.exe"(2) Set the \CMD environment variable, easy to findThe Git program's cmd directory is added to the environment vari

Git merge generates a new merged node, and Rebase does not Like what: D---E test / A---B---C---F master Merge using Merge: D--------E / \ A---B---C---F----G test, Master And the use of rebase: A---B---D---E---C '---F ' test, Master When you use

We often encounter conflicts when we use Git rebase, pull, and push, and this is when we go to merge: $ git rebase Master A conflict occurred: $ git mergetool-t opendiff Then use Opendiff to manually merge the conflicting places. However, today I met the situation th

In this summary, why is it a simple analysis? Because rebase and merge have a heated discussion on the selection issue, I have no final conclusion, and git is also in the research and development stage, many theories are not completely mature yet. If a multi-person development team submits updates frequently, the use of merge will make the historical line chart

Conflict scenarios:There is a file student.py on the master branch.Add a new dev branch to masterModify the file student.py on the Dev branch. Add function def d ():, and commit;Modify the file student.py on the master branch. Delete Function def a ():, and commit;To merge the Dev branch on the master branch, Git prompts for conflicts such as:Cause Analysis:The file student.py has been modified on both the

1. Install the meld graphical ToolGit difftool and git mergetool are git commands dedicated to providing diff and merge with our own tools.You only need to configure it: Git config -- Global diff. Tool meld # configure the default difftoolGit config -- Global merge. Tool me

There is no difference between rebase and merge for two branches, but rebase is cleaner because log hisitory is linear, but a commit is not necessarily sorted by date, but a local commit is always behind. History becomes more complex after the merge, but the commit is sorted by date, and the StackOverflow has a good illustration: Http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16666089/whats-the-difference-between-

sometimes a commit is too much, and maybe a commit just commits a small bug, so merging commits is imperative. There are two ways of doing this:one is to commit the last modified commit using parameters, and a previous commit will be merged into this commit commit:git commit-a--amend-m "My message here" if there was a commit before, and the information is: Git commit-a-M "My last Commit message" This commit message will not exist. However, the infor

Recently doing project, using git, so write it down to summarize.git clone, add and commit don't say anything ...The main thing about remote-side warehouses.First, you get something from the master branch on the remote library first:Git fetch Origin MasterOrigin is the remote repository default name, and if you re-fetch the remote repository name at remote Add, use your own name, and master is the remote branch name.This is just the equivalent of copy

Git's powerful branch management functions and its offline work make it widely used in various major enterprises. Now that there are branches, there is of course the merge problem, and the advantage that git itself can work offline also brings a headache. Since it is offline work, so developers do not need to synchronize with the server all the time, so there will be conflicts when the branches are merged t