Can Windows 7 replace vista burial XP

Windows Vista is not able to eliminate XP. Can Windows 7 do that?

Over the past two years or so, Microsoft has been controversial. It has been so since the company launched Vista. First wave after wave of bad news about vulnerabilities and backwards compatibility issues. Then, users asked Microsoft to extend the XP lifecycle indefinitely, a major obstacle to the company's promotion of Vista.

It seems that Microsoft's desktop hegemony era is gone forever. Vista seems to be pulling Microsoft off, and users are about to usher in a new era of platform-independent applications running on Linux or Mac OS x.

Of course, Microsoft has other plans. Because of Vista's poor performance in the market, the Windows development team, led by Steven Sinofsky, the new leader, has been feverishly engaged in development ventures. Sinofsky was a pragmatist, and he led the team into Vista's ills-not adding more new features.

Has Microsoft succeeded? From the information feedback from users who have used the new operating system, most of the people on the side indicate that Windows 7 performance is due to Vista. Can Windows 7 turn the tide? What's more important is that the new features in the product can eliminate XP from the market? This article will discuss Windows 7 from a number of perspectives, including security, reliability, and performance. We will also compare the performance between Windows 7,vista and XP.

Availability of

One of the areas where Vista has caused great controversy is its improved user interface. From the integrated search function to the reconfigured dialog, the user feels that Vista's user interface is quite different from XP. Worse, there is no easy way to restore the old interface.

Of course, some improvements to the Vista user interface have been identified. The comprehensive search area in each explorer window is recognized as a helpful search for files and settings in the operating system. However, Microsoft has absorbed early criticism of the Vista user interface and tried to address these issues in Windows 7. As for rearranging components, Windows 7 is actually re planning, including reorganizing some of the items in the Control Panel. The use of hardware devices and printers is a completely new process, and the search function is replaced by a more powerful key-phrase method, and users need to spend time adapting.

However, if the latest adjustment means that the Vista user interface is backward in two steps, the new toolbar implements a leap in Windows usability. In short, the Windows 7 toolbar has revolutionized the Windows user interface and embraced the fashionable graphical environment concepts of object-oriented.

The functionality of the entire workspace on the taskbar--including applications, files, and utilities--and interacting in a consistent and predictable way, so the Windows 7 user interface brings a lot of inspiration to the user. The Windows 7 user interface extends far beyond Vista and XP in terms of usability and general operability.

Performance

If a confusing interface is one of the first drawbacks that users notice in Vista, its slow performance is the ultimate cause of the user's aversion to it. Vista's performance is slow, especially on low-end hardware. In fact, many of the systems launched for Vista are useless. They either lack CPU bandwidth or have no suitable video adapters, or two are missing. These factors lead to poor quality of the early Vista drivers. Most vista users have a Vista system pre-installed when they buy a computer, while half of the enterprise users opt for XP. Vista's performance is bad.

Of course, the situation has improved over time. While the overall omissions of Vista has declined as the quality of the drive improves, Microsoft expects to address these deficiencies through a series of hot fixes and service packs. We're still learning about Windows 7, there's no free lunch in the world, and we can't rush to the temptation of DRM and background services. In the core architecture of Windows 7/vista, such things are filled with the entire system.

This is why Microsoft is making great improvements to Windows 7. Microsoft has tried to reduce the resource footprint of Windows 7 by simplifying the Vista architecture. Similar changes, such as adjusting animations, appear to be more responsive to the operating system. In addition, it is more obvious to change the precedence of background processes and how the kernel locks threads in multi-core environments.

Everyone questions: Will Windows 7 be faster than Vista? The answer is yes, but not much faster. In office 2007, for example, Windows 7 is only 4% faster than Vista with SP2. However, Windows 7 is still about 15% slower than XP.

The Officebench test and the DMS Clarity Tracker proxy show that new Windows consumes 8% more RAM than Vista when running typical workloads. But the Windows 7 team said that the product was 5% lower than the Vista thread in the test. These values increase RAM consumption by 175% and 85% of threads compared to the same workflows running in XP. So Windows 7 is a little bit faster than Vista, and it's not as fast as XP.

Security

As we mentioned earlier, the security enhancements to Vista are mainly based on third-party patches. UAC is just a standard account with built-in improvement tools. Other technologies, such as IE protection mode, ASLR and repaired firewalls, are not perfect.

The security is even worse because the default UAC execution for Win 7 is less than Vista. With the addition of Microsoft's authorized binary improvement whitelist, many reliable Windows components avoid UAC. This opens the door to an attack, and malicious code can use the automated improvement mechanism as a portal for code injection.

Microsoft is aware of this shortcoming and is beginning to tighten the parameters on the whitelist and eliminate some obvious development vulnerabilities. But there are still vulnerabilities, and Microsoft seems reluctant to deal with these vulnerabilities, based on the promise of making UAC easier before.