Somatosensory technology: Comparison between Kinect and camcube3.0

Original article: http://user.qzone.qq.com/153441816/blog/1312347331

Many technical friends around us are using the Kinect product for related applications. Even husband is one of them.
In addition to the universal technical value brought by this product, I consulted foreign manufacturers about the comparison between the Kinect product and the deep camera camcube3.0 as follows:
 

In details, it can be understood:

Camcube3.0AndKinectThe price disparity is very large, and it can be said that it is not a level of product. First,KinectIt is a consumption product and a batch product. Relatively speaking,Camcube3.0Is a system prototype used for scientific research and development. The comparison between the two systems is as follows:
1,Camcube3.0Wider working distance and adjustable working distance (you can extend the working distance to dozens of meters by changing the modulation frequency of the light source !).
2,Camcube3.0The camera adjusts the field of view by changing the optical lens.
3 , camcueb3.0 reliable depth precision ( <3mm @ 4 m) . Each pixel corresponds to a 3D data. Kinect , the resolution in the depth direction is unclear. When the target mode cannot be successfully tested, the depth graph usually has holes and the depth precision is about 3 cm -- 4 cm
4, Target object Resolution:KinectCannot distinguish fingers well,Camcube3.0More minor features can be found.KinectThe resolution is100*100, Obtained through software calibrationVGAResolution.
5,PMDThe camera is more capable of resisting ambient light interference,PMDSuitable for outdoor environments
6, In terms of volume,PMDCamera RatioKinectSmaller
7, In terms of cost,Camcube3.0RatioKinectExpensive. However, after you batch use your applications, you can customize your needs to reduce costs.