How to upgrade from Windows XP to Windows 7

Users who still use XP will not be able to do the "original state upgrade" that Vista users do, and this "original state upgrade" simply allows the new operating system to overwrite the old systems and retain the software, settings and data they had installed before. Instead, they have to come up with a completely thorough update, completely to the fact that they need to back up their original data before installing Windows 7 (uninstall XP or install it in another person's own environment), then reinstall the software and restore the data, and then reset it.

Many XP users reject Vista, not only because of the many problems with the Vista system, but also because of the upgrade model, which makes it difficult for them to accept the new version of Vista, the Windows family. On InfoWorld, Microsoft's PR department assured XP users this time there would be no "original status Upgrades" option, but they refused to explain why-a Microsoft spokeswoman said "The problem is further explained in the Windows 7 product." "(InfoWorld is a famous It news commentary website, after Vista listed this site has launched the" Save XP Action "-translator)

Why is the requirement of full renewal reasonable?

But Michael Silver, an analyst at Gartner Consulting, who studies Microsoft technology, gives compelling reasons why he doesn't support "original state upgrades." The reason for this is that "original state upgrade" will bring the original virus, registry errors, and other disruptive flaws in the user's Windows environment to Windows 7, which may not occur if they are completely updated.

Silver also said that the typical business information technology will be used to completely update the user system to avoid these problems, so for most companies, the lack of "original state upgrade" will become a problem.

Ordinary consumers and small businesses may prefer the original status upgrade option, and they may not like to make a full update of XP. Silver added to the problem: "Microsoft seems to be in a ' no win ' situation-either to support the original state upgrade and to make users feel bad about it, or to make it harder for users to install the new system without supporting it." ”

"But in any case, most users are doing quite well to implement a full update," he said, recommending to users, including Vista users, that they fully update to Windows 7 rather than the original state upgrade Vista.

Silver also warns users who are not upgraded to Vista: If you want to upgrade, it is likely that some hardware (especially before 06) will not run under Windows 7 or Vista, so it's best to install Windows 7 on a new computer first, regardless of How to find a way to install the new version of Windows can reload the original software, restore settings and data.

Provides a precedent for older versions of the original status upgrade

When Microsoft releases Windows Vista, users can opt for the original status upgrade or full update, but older versions of Windows can only choose the latter. So according to this precedent, if XP and earlier users want to upgrade to Windows 7, they can only be completely updated.

But in the second half of 2001, when Microsoft released Windows XP, whether it was a Windows 2000 user or an earlier version of the user (Windows Millennium, Windows, and Windows 98 SE), you can select the original status update. In a sense, the situation was similar to what it is now. Microsoft Millennium was technically a failure, and the user's bad comments forced Microsoft to release Windows SE. This is followed by the replacement of the kernel and the dramatic rewriting of Windows 2000 appearances, which means that the requirements for new hardware are incompatible with a large number of peripherals and software. At that time, most users stayed on Windows 98 and Windows--XP, and Microsoft changed its route to XP to provide the original status update for compatibility purposes.

From a technical point of view, changes from Windows Vista to Windows 7 are not significant, so it is easier to provide the original state update for Windows XP to Windows 7 than when you upgraded Windows 98 users to Windows XP. But Silver's mention of the "original state update on performance and security issues" may make Microsoft not choose the same approach as Windows 98 to Windows XP.

Silver Microsoft's situation compared to Apple-Apple's support for the previous three versions of users who want to upgrade to Mac OS X 10.5 leopard (i.e. upgrades from Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar, 10.3 panther, and 10.4 tiger). "This is a highly efficient, relaxed and successful upgrade, but Apple is limited." "Silver said. This is because of Apple's strong control over Mac OS-compatible hardware and its focus on operating systems.