Cloud CIO: The development of public cloud services will cause IT staff to face unemployment risk

Bernard Golden, CEO of Cloud computing consultancy Hyperstratus, wrote that most of what was not discussed in the discussion of cloud computing was that cloud computing would be a potential threat to unemployment. It is widely felt that many IT departments seem to have a lot of mood for cloud computing when it comes to introducing public cloud services. Negative emotions, which are highly stressful, generally reflect fear within people. It is hard to conclude that some of the internal IT departments ' resistance to using public cloud resources is fear of unemployment.

Upton Upton Sinclair, a novelist and instigator, said: "It is difficult for a man to understand something when his work relies on his understanding of it." "We must have seen many internal IT departments refusing to acknowledge the potential benefits or reasons for using public cloud computing. They always say the potential drawbacks of public cloud computing.

In one such survey, only 7% of all it respondents supported public cloud computing, while 47% per cent expressed support for private clouds. The result is likely to be interpreted as a self-protection desire to avoid outsourcing, as many IT people view public cloud providers as an outsourcing provider that will affect their IT careers. After all, this is the result of the recent outsourcing boom.

In the last round of contention, the subcontractor took the initiative to take over the business's data center operations and reduce its costs. Sometimes, employees are handed over to outsourced companies. However, when the new company took over, many employees received a dismissal notice.

It is natural for IT staff to resist the use of public cloud computing in the mind of these experiences. Ask an infrastructure and operations officer (he or she) about public cloud computing, like asking a turkey how it feels about Thanksgiving.

However, this is the case. If you are an infrastructure and operator, cloud computing is a threat to your work, both in the public and private cloud. Cloud computing is the virtualization of increased automation. Automation always threatens jobs, especially those with low skill levels. Simply put, cloud computing will replace jobs that perform routine operational tasks.

Collier (Paul Krill) recently published an article on the website of the information world to explain this fact. Most convincingly, he quotes Teide Chedelles, a Forrester analyst at Ted Schadler, as saying: "Cloud computing will pose a direct threat to" blue-collar "IT staff, such as administrators and other people who simply maintain the IT infrastructure.

' I've been looking for a word to exactly express the challenges that many it people face as the rise of cloud computing, ' says Gordon. Chedelles's words perfectly expressed this meaning. If you are an administrator or operator who installs, sets, and manages the basics of software components, cloud computing is likely to make you redundant. This is the redundancy caused by the automation factors of cloud computing, not the virtualization.

In fact, one reason why plain virtualization is so fast is that virtualization improves capital utilization and has little impact on employees. People can use the skills they have been using, only on virtual machines, not on physical machines. Even before the advent of cloud computing, many organizations did not adopt these features, even though virtualization reduced labor. Gordon, for example, a year ago, I spoke to an operator in the IT department of a leading technology firm. He told me that the business process outsourcing of that year started using virtual machine templates. For now, they've just built virtual machines, installed and configured all the software, just like they used to do with physical servers.

The phenomenon of automation replacing low-skilled workers is not now available. In manufacturing, it has been happening for decades. Take a look at the chart depicting the comparison of U.S. manufacturing output with manufacturing employment. Although the United States currently produces a lot more products than in the past, the industry employs a lot less. Gordon said I remember a New Yorker article published a few years ago that introduced an interesting story. A factory that produces at full throttle only one person monitors the production system.

Perhaps a proper metaphor for future infrastructure and operator unemployment may be the mass production invented by Henry Ford. By automating the assembly line, he has greatly increased productivity and greatly reduced the number of workers needed to make a car. However, the results of his creation changed the manufacturing industry. After Ford, you have to be a competitive cost assembly line manufacturer to survive in this industry and become an important industry manufacturer. The results of Ford's innovation led to the bankruptcy of hundreds of carmakers.

However, for cloud computing, it is more appropriate for a person to monitor an automated factory. Because computing is numerical, we can automate calculations without having to rely on humans to assemble parts.

The necessary skills required for these automated, highly productive cloud environments are not basic installation and setup; This is the ability to design and implement systems that automate this environment. In other words, this is the design and implementation of this information factory. The recent data center will have a standardized environment for vendors. Institutions will need these skills to operate this highly automated and standardized environment. This is much more complex than the skills required to install and set up a single server. Future infrastructure and operators need to make a big difference in skills. Those who cannot make such a transition will face major fluctuations in their careers.

How does cloud computing affect the role of the CIO? What does this mean for CIOs or other senior IT administrators? This is a problem for junior employees, right?

Gordon said that my company's view was that, like Henry Ford's changing the economy of the assembly plant, cloud computing would change the economy of the information plant. It organizations will face economic challenges they have not faced before. In short, IT organizations will be under pressure to meet the cost structure requirements of the best public cloud provider.

This is not a question of compressing the budget by a few percentage points by reducing travel and delaying training. This is a completely different way to cut costs: it requires a thorough rethink of the cost of the entire data center, including the old-fashioned part and the established private cloud environment.

Failure to consider service delivery and the institutions needed to provide these services poses a threat to the most senior IT officer's tenure. We have seen this problem in other areas of business such as human resources in the past. The new type of outsourced human resources services companies appear in large numbers and recommend that enterprises transfer human resources functions to external providers in order to save costs. Many human resources officials insist that only their own personnel can provide the necessary services to their employees because they are familiar with the organization, contact the site and better align with the user agencies. But economic factors ultimately win. The human resources officials who did the old way were eventually replaced by the new people. The new people say they can provide a cost competitive advantage of services.

Similarly, future successful it officials will recognise themselves as infrastructure managers charged at market prices, rather than asset owners. If people accept the idea of an information factory, the problem for CIOs is how to run the factory as efficiently as possible (their IT department).

' I sometimes wonder whether the whole private cloud and the public cloud will be overshadowed by the brutal struggle between the old system and the SaaS, the software, ' he said. The vast majority of it budgets are related to older systems. Most IT organizations treat older systems as irreplaceable systems, and there is nothing to do except manage as simply as possible and maintain as little as possible.

How do we justify sticking to existing systems when SaaS alternatives are so cheap? Gordon said, for example, I recently met a CIO. He transforms the existing in-house kernel system into an optional workday application and pays for the entire migration with the cost savings of the first year. The cost of saving every year is windfall. When SaaS Alternative solutions offer so much cost-saving benefits, a CIO who does not have a proactive plan to transform the old system will make his position untenable.

The IT industry will change more over the next 10 years than it has in the past 30 years. People immersed in long-standing practices will not recognize the IT organization for 2021 years. After 10 years, we looked back at today's infrastructure and operations staff as if they were looking for a long-distance call in Black-and-white movies: "Hello, operator, please connect me to New York." "Do they have to do things like that?" Make sure you don't end up being the IT administrator of the Phone switchboard administrator.

(Responsible editor: admin)