Community product creators need the same skills as politicians.

Any set of rules seems easy on paper, but once implemented into the real world, there will always be problems! Any social public policy formulation, especially when it is carried out in the community, especially a large country, has the consequences of which it is not entirely conceivable.

For example, take the property tax this matter, you say how to collect?


If one household, one family can have a house of tax-free second suite tax, good, there are policies under the countermeasures, he will find a way. For example, some city people he will find a way to divorce, the couple a divorce, parents again a divorce, mother-in-law again a divorce, a six suites, we six, you can first six suites duty-free, so you do not levy.


if I were to tax it on a per capita basis, you couldn't do it. Then I put the poor relatives of the countryside to live, then some migrant workers, you go to check again to identify which identity card is false, is true, this household in the end how many people, that is an astronomical system costs AH.


If that's what I'm going to levy on the value of the property, but you know, in China, in the north, a lot of the people living in the center of the central city are very valuable, but he may be poor. Because the state-owned institutions or factories of the old workers, he devoted his life to the country, to the end of such a room, or in the city center, the house is very valuable, their own retirement wages few son. Do you think you should ask for his high property tax? This is just a few small examples of the property levy, it is easy to plan from the paper, but once the implementation of the specific tax is difficult.


We change the example, and then put it into the community product rules, a simple user ID this thing to see that there are a lot of said, please see the vegetable Head uncle's article:


when a community administrator who is committed to building a mature user group sees the user ID as: Let me ☆ve 噯 ni, Vatican Revenge is workspace, 簞 蒓 Wolf type of form, should feel the inner kink, evil, the palms itch? Not to mention the devastating effect of the apparent expulsion of the target audience after the ID is filled with the community.


It is easy to think of an ID license list, choose commonly used thousands of Chinese characters, remove the variant, remove the symbol, in the registration of this off the possibility of a complete loss of this ID. Yes, the games that have been repeated on the web for years are starting again. Then you will see a new batch of IDs: I am your big ye, Mao Zesi, Love yin tore blanket, stem Hu Jia Yin ... War escalation, the use of banned thesaurus, prohibit the ID with the fuck, day, dry, rape, cunt, cock and so on and so on in the text, get a slightly smaller number of ID thesaurus. But, immediately will see: The Dry Nepal Brew, the Nidayed, the jade, the elegant butterfly ... Appear。 So the Administrator Insight Chinese profound, can not use ordinary means to deal with.


Administrator to the bitter experience, decided to manually audit each ID, and once the ID is determined, do not allow any changes. So he could finally get a good night's sleep after a week of pain and suffering. But the next morning he was surprised to find many of the self introductions behind the IDs turned out to be like this: Wang Dafu---Sleep the stork ape his mother, Zhao Si XI---Your ID contains illegal characters. More to his surprise, the community's first popular posts below, neatly more than 1000 people reply: Landlord silly bo! Stay in formation downstairs, or go out and die the whole family. So, overall mobilization, every signature to audit, every post must be first time, the whole community is no longer what you see is income, but first, please wait patiently. The administrators found that they had a lot more in common, while the community's spending climbed sharply on the editorial labor cost.


This war has been on the internet for many years and the war has been protracted. There is a gap between the demand for personalized expression and the structural standardization of website information, and when the desire cannot be fully met, it must come up with a way to overstep the limit and show it fiercely elsewhere. One obvious reality is that the intensity of this desire is positively correlated with the ability to act, and the person with the desire has endless time and energy to confront the administrator, inventing endless new methods and new forms.


with a politically correct words: the problem of the solution depends on the station to set up a suitable and reasonable product mechanism, so that the user's exuberant energy through the appropriate way to show, in order to achieve the results. Unfortunately, it seems that this method does not exist at present.


observation Network on the existing solutions, can be summed up as:


1, content expulsion. Specific content is only valid for specific users, and non specific content consumers accidentally break in, unable to find common topic, forced to leave. This approach is more common in professional and vertical communities, such as professional financial sites that are less intrusive than those of three low users.


2. Speaking threshold. When the cost of speaking is zero, the cost of harassment is nil. As a result, some websites set a threshold for speaking, including but not limited to: binding mobile phones, binding mailboxes, binding identity cards, user hierarchy and so on. The goal is to increase the cost of speaking and the ID costs, so that users can not easily waive the right to speak.


3, public area control and user partition. Based on Web2.0 UGC products, especially those with SNS characteristics, users should be able to control the information they can receive, and the chance of being harassed by others is lower than that of Web1.0 products. However, the public areas of Community products are part of the disaster area. Thus, one idea is that users who affirm and approve of their behavior can enter a prominent position in the public domain, and that users who do not encourage their behavior can only enter the secondary position of the public area, not even the active display. Another way is to conduct user segmentation, according to behavioral characteristics of different users into different groups, not visible to each other, can not communicate, not aware of each other's existence. As a result, the total number of communities has been growing.


4, member referral system.


above is not a complete solution, and all may trigger an equal amount of countermeasures, there are obvious loopholes. For different periods, different operating conditions, the implementation of one or a combination, will have a different effect. But there is no permanent solution. Or the genius who can think of a plan is on the way.

The larger the
community, the more cautious the changes to the existing rules, and any changes in the community will lead to a lot of dissatisfaction among the fans, as these features are used by users, and the user's knowledge is based on these existing rules. For example, the revision of watercress and the revision of Facebook are so.


and the Division of national policies and Community rules, the policy has the Constitution and the law of the law, then the Community rules have the underlying rules and application layer rules.


, the bottom rule is that simple, users can ask questions and answers in a community freedom (not in violation of state regulations), do a bit of praise, comment, or review the problem, and pay attention to the person answering the question. In the earliest days of knowing the rules of the community that is, as in the Constitution, this is fixed. But as the knowledge grows larger, there are many different functions that meet the needs of different user scenarios. For example, text editor, there is no picture before, now there are pictures, but do not support the GIF format, then why not support GIF format? In fact, this is also a balance point of consideration.


The purpose of the ancient political reform is generally army, then the reason of the change of the Community rule is to increase the stickiness of the users and enlarge the communication between the communities.


and the way of both is generally: in the case of not touching the existing interests, to achieve army or improve the user's sticky purpose!


Community product creators are, to some extent, the same skills that politicians need!