Three ways to implement agility for mobile SaaS applications

Software as a service (SaaS) application needs to track the employees it supports, but not necessarily the successful implementation. In the case of the enterprise, mobile SaaS applications can be changed for the following reasons, which may be due to rules governing application changes, mobile device policy changes, employee activity changes, and mobile OS feature changes. With so many variables, there is no perfect strategy to maintain the agility of mobile SaaS applications, but choosing the right SaaS provider, customizing SaaS services for mobile use cases, or even building your own SaaS helps.

Assessment of SaaS Agility

No matter where the driving force forces mobile application users and their SaaS providers to change, SaaS providers should be able to respond to regulatory changes that affect applications, which is a key metric for users to decide to enter the application tracking market. The problem is that every SaaS evaluator needs to ask how quickly the application adapts to regulatory-induced changes. This response is measured on a monthly basis and inevitably leads to regulatory problems, suggesting that providers are not able to quickly change applications. The same inertia can affect the ability of SaaS providers to respond to other change requirements, so it is wiser to choose a different provider.

When evaluating a provider, you should carefully review the provider's application interface (API) for SaaS. The API is critical because the user has a problem with the SaaS on the phone because of changes in their BYOD policies, changes in mobile OS or work practices, as users typically buy services directly from SaaS providers. These applications usually have a specific platform, so replacing the platform poses some challenges that users themselves cannot make. The most significant solution is to avoid consuming SaaS through the mobile applications offered by providers, such as the development of Mobile SaaS for SaaS Services within an enterprise, or the replacement of an application based SaaS with Browser-based services.

The most important technical problem in supporting Agile mobile SaaS applications through these mechanisms is that the SaaS provider exposes the API. Most IT professionals know that the RESTful API is easier to work with, especially for teams that are more familiar with web development. Ideally, the SaaS provider should provide RESTful APIs, Soa/soap APIs, and application options, but for the best agile, the RESTful API is critical; Other options may not apply to all mobile devices.

DIY SaaS application ensures agility

Internal application development for the RESTful SaaS API is easy to implement, in fact, most multi-platform development tools are now available to mobile devices and support this type of interface. In most cases, one of these platforms provides the best choice for writing your own mobile applications to increase application agility, but to ensure that new platforms or platform changes can be quickly supported, it is necessary to know how old platforms and change platforms release data and adjust adaptation through tool providers. In order to reduce risk, you may need to adjust the BYOD strategy, if you use to build your own application route, you need to limit the number of different platforms supported; If not, you might want to choose a browser approach. The risk of this approach is that your organization's application development becomes a barrier to change, not a SaaS provider.

Good JavaScript and HTML5 practices can provide flexibility in the GUI, using changes in the SaaS API, even if changes are added to new features or areas. The key to this work is the choice of browsers. Not all browsers are good at supporting scripts and new HTML features or versions, so if applying agility is important, choosing the most flexible browsers is critical to support your BYOD policy-licensed platform range. Check out the history of the release and focus on how to add new performance, as past releases are often a way for a browser provider to respond better to future changes.

In most cases, you can expand your own cloud hosting application elements in the SaaS provider's regular interface. In fact, all you have to do is write a front-end for the SaaS provider's services, merging the providers and all of their own functionality. This new SaaS layer may be hosted on a SaaS provider's own service or on a different cloud. Be aware of isolation and detection issues; mobile users do not actually use SaaS services, so it may be difficult to track problems through additional layers.

are IaaS or PAAs more agile than SaaS?

When all of these failures are applied, users who need to apply agility can replace SaaS services by hosting applications in the infrastructure that is service (IaaS) or platform-service (PaaS). Managed standalone packages its users look like SaaS, mostly because all cloud applications look like SaaS to customers. As a result, IT staff can deploy any suitable packages in the cloud to create virtual or "Self-saas" for mobile employees. Third-party applications may still have agility problems, but there are more providers to choose from, and many providers offer custom GUI. If the open source package is available, you can also adjust it yourself.

Which agile strategy is best: research and development applications, browser-based applications or proprietary SaaS? The user believes that although browser-based Custom SaaS services implemented through the RESTful API can support change requirements, they also reveal the company's short board. The level of customization that surrounds a browser-based build-access mobile application is astonishing, eliminating the delay in adapting to changes. This method can be used first, followed by the introduction of other types of customization.

(Responsible editor: The good of the Legacy)