rebase vs merge

ObjectiveI believe most of the friends who use Git will meet the same question, and also search for a lot of information from the Internet. So, why do I have to write this article? Because I want to try to explain the problem from their own perspective, if you can give everyone a flash of inspiration, it is good. Estimated points in the friends also have a certain understanding of the merge and rebase, so I

reprint from 2015-12-02 Lazybios Day ArchCompared to the merge command, we are relatively unfamiliar with the rebase, rebase this command in the "Pro Git book" translated into "Yan", feel good awkward, personal feeling whether it is from the tone or line (for) called "variable base" to be better and more appropriate. The general flow of rebaseSTEP1: Scenario Assu

git merge and git rebase two are used to merge two branches, and in the process of use, these two concepts are easy to confuse.Here, the usage of these two git tricks is described in detail, hoping to help some git-loving friends.------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------git

Original address: http://blog.csdn.net/hudashi/article/details/7664631Git rebase is used to merge changes from one branch into the current branch. Suppose you now create a branch called "MyWork" based on the remote branch "origin". $ git Checkout-b mywork origin assumes that the remote branch "origin" already has 2 commits, now we make some changes in this branch and then generate two commits. $ VI file.txt

Use Merge and Rebase in Git to synchronize code with open-source projects, gitrebase There are two main working modes for open-source project-based development. Mode 1 is to pull a branch from an open-source project, develop a new feature in this branch, and merge it into upstream. Applicable to developers who are open-source projects. Mode 2 develops independent

Original link: http://zires.info/tag/git-merge/git merge is used to merge two branches.# merge the B branches into the current branchgit merge Bgit cherry-pick can choose one or several commits (s) in one branch to operate. For example, suppose we have a stable version of th

In this summary, why is it a simple analysis? Because rebase and merge have a heated discussion on the selection issue, I have no final conclusion, and git is also in the research and development stage, many theories are not completely mature yet. If a multi-person development team submits updates frequently, the use of merge will make the historical line chart

SVN rebase and Merge [Chkq76@chieftec dev_youtube_4_4]$ SVN Pl. eosu@leosu:/mnt/sda3/dev_iptv/digitalis_telia_merge$ svn proplist. Properties on '. ': Kbs:logfilter Svn:ignore Svn:externals Kbs:interface_dirs Svn:mergeinfo Kbs:products [Chkq76@chieftec dev_youtube_4_4]$ SVN pg Svn:mergeinfo. >tmp.info $SVN propget Svn:mergeinfo | grep bsg/trunk #svn Merge--

There is no difference between rebase and merge for two branches, but rebase is cleaner because log hisitory is linear, but a commit is not necessarily sorted by date, but a local commit is always behind. History becomes more complex after the merge, but the commit is sorted by date, and the StackOverflow has a good il

519git status520git LG521git add src/522Git commit-m"RESTful API and portal" //commit to your local branch first. 523git LG524Git fetch-p//Origin's commit will be pulled to the local 525git LG526Git rebase origin/develop//rebase to Branch 527git status528git LG529git status530git add src/531Git commit-m"rebase origin Develop" //resolve conflicts, and then com

We often encounter conflicts when we use Git rebase, pull, and push, and this is when we go to merge: $ git rebase Master A conflict occurred: $ git mergetool-t opendiff Then use Opendiff to manually merge the conflicting places. However, today I met the situation that cannot

Initial:New_branch n1--n2|Master M1--M2--M3------------------------------------1. Merge$ (Master) git merge New_branchMaster M1--m2--n1--m3--n2--merge Branch New_branch2. Rebase$ (master) git rebase master New_branchAutomatically switches to new_branch after executionNew_bra

not affect other people's work.In fact, the above is the rebase and merge different application scenarios.In the case of scenario 1, if you modify a bug in a common code, this is the time to put all the OEM version branches rebase to the branch to fix the bug, in the rebase process, Git will ask you to manually resolv

Git merge generates a new merged node, and Rebase does not Like what: D---E test / A---B---C---F master Merge using Merge: D--------E / \ A---B---C---F----G test, Master And the use of rebase: A---B---D---E---C '---F ' test, Master

We often encounter conflicts when using git rebase, pull, and push. At this time, we will go to merge: $ git rebase master Conflict: $ git mergetool -t opendiff Then, use opendiff to manually merge the conflicting location. However, today I met a situation where merge is

Reference: git merge different repositories? # in Proj2: git remote add proj1 path/to/proj1 git fetch proj1 git merge Proj1/master # or whichever branch yo U Want to merge Operation: There are two warehouses: Strongword and a The requirement is to add a warehouse into the Strongword warehouse: Purpose: To add a to the Strongword inside the other r

Command Format Let's take a look at the Command Format of Git-rebase: Git rebase [-I | -- Interactive] [Options] [-- onto Git rebase [-I | -- Interactive] [Options]-onto -Root [Git rebase-continue |-Skip |-Abort From the command format, you can see the git-rebae commandAt leastYou need a parameter A small place When y

Alvin lee!\n"); return 1; The error has been modified over. More usage, and listen to let's *************************************************** 1. Background of the occurrence: When you submit the code, the administrator discovers that your code cannot be submitted to the server, mainly because some of the commits in your commit and server are no longer on the same timeline, that is, some of your commits are to be inserted between certain commits in the server, This can result in code con