Enterprise information Miscellaneous: Business and needs (2)

I have always had a narrow point of view on Enterprise Informatization:LetProgramWait for a period of time in the corresponding position..

My point of view is often despised by countless people. They always find countless points of view to illustrate my mistakes and mistakes, but they have never succeeded on the road of enterprise informatization!

So when they despise me, I can only smile! Smile without saying anything!

Why is there such a view?

On the road of enterprise informatization, the greatest entropy is not a variety of bugs, but the process adjustment and business optimization! Is not fully understood in various meaningless discussions! Today, I traveled 30 km to the east. I don't think it's right to go 20km to the west tomorrow.

Even if you find a good person to understand and collect the business back, then make a document and restate it to the developers, how much can you ensure they understand? Really Understand? How big is the error?

How many developers are there in your development team? How big is the error here? Is there a rough concept in your mind?

Enterprise Informatization: there is no error in saying that it is an empty building pavilion. The informatization you want to build exists in your imagination.

Human consciousness and ways of thinking are all referring to the square and various edges in reality. informatization is a thing that cannot see sides and borders. even if you can browse through a computer, it is also a plane that is hard to touch. It is difficult to find an accurate reference when you define it in the brain!

For IT professionals (We will discuss this experience separately later.He may be able to figure out a space in his mind. however, it is impossible for us to extract this item to all employees and related developers of the company, and it is even more impossible for the post personnel to resonate with you!

As a result, we can only dictate and make various prototypes to read and review all links!

Some people say: Oh, this is what it is! Keep nodding. Let's look at the other party again: I don't want this thing! No.

This is a perfect situation!

In terms of process, the more links there are, the more likely the error will be. The shortest line between two points!

So when the business is transformed into a requirement and passed to the developer, can you ensure that what is originally round will not become square? We need to understand that everyone's understanding and presentation abilities are different.

Only in the tianchao education system will there be a piece of text with only one central idea!

Bringing developers closer to their posts can play two fundamental roles:

1. Reduce the variation and error during information transmission! It can also be corrected
2. Strengthen communication and communication between developers and actual personnel (do not underestimate this communication and communication)

These two points are enough!
There is a classic case: 10 people stand in one column, and the first person will tell the people behind the story if they say more than 20 words, if you compare the first person and the last person, how many changes have taken place? This is the variation of information in the transmission process!
You can understand that a piece of information is transmitted in 10 links, resulting in variations! However, during the transfer of the same 10 pieces of information in three links (post personnel, demand personnel, and developers), the variation of information increases by three times. When the number of job positions is n, the variation content is also increased by N times!
This is another repeat in the process of enterprise informatization, and it is also a risk!

I know that many people will find various reasons and rules to demonstrate my ideas. Not feasible! Because they have long been narrowly controlled by traditional ways of thinking and logic! Instead of thinking in a constructive way: How should I create conditions to try!
You know, I hope that your rejection of me is the same as your rejection of the past. Can you really stand at a balance point?