Agile development Prajna agile Series II: What is agility (on)

This is the second article in the agile development series. (One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine)

The so-called "no living" includes two meanings: not living in the law, not living in the air. The former is better understood, and the latter will be detailed in the next article.

Instead of believing that there is the best way in the world, we must abide by it.

Legal Statement

The persistence of law is known as law enforcement.

The typical practice is that many enterprises use CMMs.

I have trained and consulted cmme for more than 10 enterprises. The working days are from 41 days ~ 43 days. Can you imagine that so many enterprises have different starting points, different endpoints, different personnel, and different industries. Can you use the same consulting workload to improve CMMS? Neither I nor my company is an irresponsible company, so we lost a consulting list of nearly all requirements under 41 days, which is actually a minimum date, but all enterprises have chosen it without hesitation.

Later, I went to the European consulting company DNV, because the company told me that their consulting in Europe was 150 days × 2 years = 1 cmme level, the truth is also true when the European Headquarters communicates with foreign consultants, so there is new hope. But the result is that our consulting business is difficult in China, because the cost is too high and the time is too long.

41 ~ The accuracy of 43 indicates that even if the user does not just want a paper certificate, there must be a general and unified method to improve the enterprise.

From the 98-year-old term "must be called Moto", to the later study of Lenovo, to Huawei, and later I don't know what to learn. Please set up a template for me directly, are the embodiment of law enforcement.

Agile Law Enforcement

Agility broke the old law, but also set up the new law. Why?

"How do we know that we are agile ?" "Is it agile to do this ?" All these problems indicate that agility is a legal rule. Otherwise, these problems will not start from scratch. However, ifBy breaking the law enforcement, these questions become pseudo-propositions and do not need to be answered without answers..

Later, I will talk about "what is the future of agility", and I will talk about "Agile development, no matter how well it is intended, will certainly be mixed with commercial interests during promotion, so as to get worse ." (If you had an expert at the last party, everyone would just nod)

In fact, there have been disputes in the agile world, and each of them has a good genre. These are because we are promoting different methods, and there will naturally be disputes.

In fact,There is no equality between the various laws, and there is only a difference between the factors (internal factors, external factors). As a result, different methods should be used in different scenarios, or even new methods should be used instead.. This is already described in the smart agile series.

Therefore, the following problems can be used as communication in Agile context, but as the starting point of idea, there is a problem:

1. "We cannot start every Hitachi event. We want to push it next month"

2. "The current automated test coverage rate is 80%, and we strive to achieve 90%"

3. "Our current iteration cycle is two weeks, and we strive to achieve a week"

......

Using law as a method to achieve the goal, rather than an aim, is the key to breaking the law enforcement. The so-called "no living" means to break the law enforcement and stay in the inherent law without perseverance.

After breaking the law enforcement, it is easy to fall into the empty hold, that is, there is no absolutely best method, so there is no need to pursue, willing to the status quo. It is very difficult to balance null and there, which is the content of the next article.