Architect's Discussion

Wz

architect this thing. What do the architects of our division do? But do not participate in specific functional development
Stst

Not to be concrete means to be empty

Dh

Do the technology selection? Performance optimization Ah, security special.

Stst

I do not believe, do not do concrete, can make the design well

Dh

That's because it's been a lot of years.

I've never seen a architect's title in the first graduation.

Stst

No specific, no specific feedback, no feedback, there is no way to confirm the design is not a problem

Long teens Also, this industry is not exactly the same design, nor is it necessary

Dh

Our position is more like a senior developer.
CRS ?

Speaking of which, I suddenly remembered, front-end time. NET? MVP, Old Zhao's microblog has said an interesting thing
Said it was their J.P. Morgan recruit an architect, and then an IBM senior architect to apply, the result of old Zhao casually asked a, enter a number courtship, the IBM Senior architect can not answer

Dh

The definition of position is different for each company

Crs

Then the microblog sparked a series of discussions ... and brought in Ali's peep.

Dh

It's not a standard in the world.

Mk

He's not in Ali's way right now.

Crs

Today Zheng has sent this PDF ... I looked it over again.

I still don't see what the architect is doing.
Mk

So he can't count.

Dh

The company says you're an architect, right? There's not a lot of people doing anything else with an architect's title.

Crs

So... Here's the question.

Ali's Chenhao (this level expert) can be considered an architect?

Dh

such as "automated Test architects"

Stst

The architect puts the concept together and provides one to two specific implementations to verify that no problem is given to everyone to implement specific concepts
Crs

Weak weak questions. What are the automation test architects doing ....
Dh

I've heard about this position in a group before.
Crs

That's the problem again.

You know it's no problem.

Dh

I was wondering what I was doing.
Mk

No, it's nonsense.

LF

What the hell is that?

Crs

Yes, what the hell is this job?

Hx

Verification, it will verify the point of doubt, if an architecture to verify everything, then what kind of architecture ah

Stst

Verification, that is, the architecture through specific examples run through, it is verified

What do you think the architecture is, a circle?
Crs

Then I have a low-force problem ... It's called architecture ....

Mk

Architecture is to draw a circle ah ... At least we're all drawing a circle here.

Let me ask you a question.

Architecture to understand technology?

Stst

Architecture to focus on two issues

What do you got? Has

What is it? Is

and get verified

Mk

Well, that's not the frame.

It's fine.

Looks like the times are improving.

Stst

Has: What is the system composed of, has been refined to the scope of operation

is: The hierarchical relationship of the concepts involved in the system, but also to be refined to the scope of operation

Stst

The only way to operate is to run through one or two examples

and give it to everyone, to do more of the concept.

Does it make sense for the architect to stop his mouth?

Mk

Amount: Make sense ... At least now the company is.

Stst

"Existence is right", this is not the scope of our discussion, there is not necessarily meaningful
"Active" Jiang Wujin-North section

Is it reasonable to exist?

Stst

Eat cooked rice also exist a lot of, you think also justified, that is out of the subject of discussion now

"Active" lj-guangzhou u

Not because of the existence of some parallel imports? Deny the value of this role

Stst

Yes, do not write code architecture what
"Active" Jiang Wujin-North section

Existence must have the meaning of existence, if there is no meaning? Or is it long gone? Or we have not found it, human beings in the process of continuous progress, always constantly create any truth and overthrow any collation, such as Newton's theorem
Crs

Has: What is the system composed of, has been refined to the scope of operation

is: The hierarchical relationship of the concepts involved in the system, but also to be refined to the scope of operation

=====================================
Still a little indefinitely ah.

I'm just a low-force ...

Stst

A system architecture that cannot be fully described with a situation, sequence, activity, Class diagram ..., which can only describe one perspective

Since the development of software engineering, it is recognized that two views are most effective for describing system architecture, one is composition, and the other is hierarchical concept.

So the architect's responsibility should be to sort out the two views

If the view is too coarse and cannot be implemented, it must be refined to a certain extent, and the architect himself needs to be constantly given feedback during the refinement process to fix the schema based on feedback

There is no one step architecture, and don't be paranoid about one step

So, architects do not do specific coding, do out of the design, is not credible

Lj

Architect? Why not encode it; don't underestimate the architect.

Stst

So, the architects who don't work are eating cooked rice.

Work is the architect's most powerful tool and his greatest strength.

Architect's Discussion