Is Windows really so easy to screen blue?

 

When talking about the advantages and disadvantages of mac and PC, many people love to use windows for easy blue screen presentation, but is windows really so easy for blue screen? I was a freshman majoring in computer science. I had a little understanding of my skills. I started to get in touch with my computer at the first day. At that time, I bought a Pentium series desktop computer (which was the best when I bought it ), I used the XP operating system. In the long years, I bought a lot of pirated discs and installed many pirated games (please support genuine ones). Poor websites have also browsed, the virus is also in use. (for some time, even anti-virus software was not installed. At that time, 360 was completely unavailable. I bought a rising card. After the deadline, I felt that I was useless and I was not buying a new one, so there is no other anti-virus software). After going to high school, I changed my computer to use Windows 7, which is also a small task. During this period, I only used the blue screen once when I used XP, in Windows 7, system restoration is useless. During the summer of freshman year, when I used my notebook to play GTA4 in New York City, I had a black screen (heat dissipation problem ). However, we always think that windows is always faulty, so I would like to ask: Is windows 7 really so prone to problems? (MBP is really beautiful, mac OS is also good, sometimes it is really fast (some buddies in the dormitory use apple, so they see pig every day), next time they buy a new apple, but I just like her appearance)

 

 

Windows will have a blue screen, Mac will be five countries, and Linux will be Kernel Panic. Software is written by humans. Naturally, there will be bugs. The more complicated the software is, the more bugs it may be, and the more bugs it knows that no one has fixed.

 

It may be a better choice to back up your data in the production environment.

 

Windows 9x uses Monolithic Kernel. This large Kernel can cause the operating system to crash immediately when a driver error occurs; Windows NT is led by Dave Cutler to redesign the Hybrid Kernel (Hybrid Kernel ), fewer crashes than the 9x series. Mac OS X uses MicroKernel, and the coupling between the kernel and other operating system components is small. Errors of other components do not easily affect the kernel, so it does not often crash.

 

@ Feng Dong's opinion:

OS X is a dual-mode kernel, and the driver can be in kernel-space or user-space. But the latter is almost always used for development. The released driver is in the kernel-space. In the hybrid kernel of NT, the driver is in the kernel-space. Linux is Monolithic, but it is stable.

 

On the other hand, monolithic only does not have a unified user-space API, it does not prevent you from developing your own user-space driver solution (generally a small kernel-space stab with a large user-space manager), such as USF under OS X.

 

Large kernel focuses on code design and pushes functions to the real service/daemon. Microkernel is not widely used. In particular, the outdated microkernel design such as Mach. XNU kernel retains the message distribution of Mach, but that's all. There is almost no kernel service Running in user-space.

 

Windows 9x has a very high probability of blue screen. Even when Gates demonstrated windows, blue screen even occurred. On the one hand, windows too stressed that it is backward compatible with 16-bit software. However, after windows is fully converted into an NT kernel, the blue screen is rare.

 

After-sales services in a computer company...

Windows blue screen is divided into several situations:

 

First, hardware problems: most of the problems I have seen appear in the memory, followed by the graphics card

Second, drivers: Driver conflicts. Pay special attention to the issue that drivers should not update software such as drivers or drivers.

Third, viruses. This probability is related to personal habits and security awareness.

Fourth, software conflicts. Pay special attention to some issues between software development and games. I have encountered conflicts between the video subsystem and a small game on the left, and the blue screen is as long as it is packed together.

Fifth, the motherboard BIOS conflicts with some games. I don't know how it works, but I have seen bugs in the motherboard BIOS on some forums, and sometimes blue screens will appear when playing some games.

 

Do not trust the blue screen code of Windows... the accuracy is too low... but it may be that I have poor capabilities. Mi understands what they mean...

 

Computers are used for humans. If you pay more attention to them, there will be fewer blue screens. If you don't pay attention to them, there will be more...

 

The stability of mac OS x is based on Apple's own industrial products, and the hardware compatibility of these products has been strictly tested by Apple's Development Department, on the contrary, windows systems run on a variety of brand-name machines and assembly machines. Therefore, the blue screen is much more likely to be caused by incompatibility caused by hardware problems than mac OS x.

The same is true for software. mac OS x has fewer applications than windows. Especially in China, Apple users install far less software than windows users, therefore, the system has much less interference than windows, not to mention the system crash caused by the installation of software and the accompanying rogue plug-ins.

I am using mac OS x. I used Windows 7 three months ago. I feel that Windows 7 is currently the best choice for all desktop operating systems. It is times better than Windows 7. Stable System, rich applications, strong game performance, and good Optimization of various software.

For the blue screen, I have never seen the blue screen (PS: the problem of displaying the driver is not counted) if it is not for various system environment configurations and development environment configurations ).

This article is from the "technology Emperor or low technology" blog