Old: technology and business, which are the most important?

We have all learned the "Philosophy" text. We can say that some of them have repeatedly learned it several times, from junior high school "Citizens" to High School "Political Economics ", the "Marxist philosophical principles and Mao overview" in the university all reflect some philosophical thoughts. So far, some of my views have flashed in my mind from time to time: "Dogmatism", "ontology", "one size fits all", and "two sides of things ". These ideas have taught us some principles for doing things, and cultivate our outlook on life and world view to provide some guiding functions.

In the network, we often see similar problems, such as: "useless technology theory", "this language is better than that language", "It is better to spread technology", and "DoProgramSales personnel are not as good as sales personnel. This shows that many people still have a sense of crisis, because they cannot find their own direction in many different arguments. It also shows that some people are bored at ordinary times, some questions are thrown out to cultivate the ability to debate. Of course, there must be no denying the right or wrong argument. The saying goes that many things in the world have no right or wrong. Everyone has different goals in their own stages of life, and may have different views on a thing over time, because some life experiences will change some of my views. Just like the story of "blindly touching people", everyone expresses only one aspect of things. If such a view occupies too much space in the head, it is easy to go to the "extreme" of the problem ". It is with limited energy that an individual cannot understand everything in the world. Therefore, different professions and different division of labor are formed, which is also the inevitable result of social development. It is precisely because of the division of labor that "collaboration" occurs. If a person understands everything, he does not need the "collaboration" of others. It is precisely because of "collaboration" that "Leadership" emerged. Without coordination of leadership and macro resource allocation, collaboration cannot be completed. It is precisely because of the need of "leaders" that the concept of compound talents has emerged, because leaders will say, "Comrade XX, it would be nice if you understood that thing again ". The implication is that if you want to understand it, you should not go to the meeting for coordination so hard. It seems that I had to work harder for the sake of leadership. Of course, this is not a bad thing for you. It is their "Laziness" behavior that makes you a "Leader" talent. This reflects the two sides of things ".

When we study a technology, it is easy to think that the business is not important, and when we often move on to the end user, it is easy to be biased against the technology. If a person is always in touch C/S Type of application development, not developed B/S Type of application, it is likely that the development B/S No technology is required. If a person often uses C ++ Development, and may look down upon it VB Language development. Ordinary people tend to escape the conventional prejudice. "As soon as humans think, God will laugh." Hope god will not laugh when he sees these words.