8M Bandwidth: Telecom industry false-false triple-net fusion

This reporter Zhang Telecom industry and radio and television industry this time "riveting" on.　　It originated last week, the Ministry of Information and the National Development and Reform Commission, and other seven ministries issued the "on the promotion of the third generation of mobile communications network construction views" and "on the promotion of optical fiber broadband network construction views." Of the two documents, the most notable is the Ministry of Public Sector announced a "two-year Plan": by 2011, Fiber broadband port over 80 million, urban user access capacity of average 8M, rural user access capacity on average 2 m, commercial building users basically realize 100M access capabilities.　　Over 3 years of investment in fiber-optic broadband network construction more than 150 billion yuan, new broadband users more than 50 million. and in March "2010 CCBN Theme Report", SARFT deputy director Haitao just released a "three-year Plan", that is, "in the next 3 years will be in major cities in China to complete the NGB network work."　　"Fiber-optic households" against NGB, "three net fusion" finally entered the substantive confrontation. Avoid "investment for investment" on "Three net integration", the recent radio and television industry busy is very happy, about the "license", video, shopping, IPTV news constantly.　　The telecoms industry has been silent until the advent of 8M bandwidth. The March "Telecom New Deal" is a signal, Premier Wen Jiabao proposed to encourage and guide private capital into the "telecommunications infrastructure sector." The Ministry obviously attaches great importance to this policy, not only put forward a huge investment plan of 550 billion yuan, but also detailed to the specific parameters and the number of new users.　　However, the issue of how to raise and distribute the investment is not clear, it can be foreseen that "8M bandwidth" there are follow-up measures. The value of "8M bandwidth" is beyond doubt. According to Ma Jihua, a communications expert, "broadband is not wide" has seriously restricted the information process in China. "China's average bandwidth is 1.8M, only 8.7% of Korea." Moreover, the network is mainly ADSL access, most of the downlink rate does not exceed 4M, the broadband access rate lags far behind many developed countries, such as Japan has more than 90M.　　"But the question is, will the large-scale construction of" 8M bandwidth "be duplicated with NGB? Communications expert knife Horse told reporters that NGB is based on high-definition, the number of changes in the flow of the architecture, if the expected bandwidth can be achieved, can fully meet the full business needs. "But everyone wants to occupy the channel, and the telecommunications industry, some of the optical fiber has been laid, in the big cities just expansion of the problem."　　"The knife horse thinks that repeat investment is unavoidable, but this time it will be better co-ordinated by the government." Communication Expert Liang also expressed the same view. He thought it would be a test for operators to avoid falling into the "Investing for investment" cycle and how to make good use of these investments in the planning context. "Operators will face greater investment pressure and should promote investment by other investors in order to ease the financial pressure, of course, this requires corresponding supporting policies." Ma Jihua said"The value of the two-document-related stocks is much more than the actual operational significance." "He thinks China's current broadband situation is poor, even if Beijing is difficult to reach 8M in two years," I hope that the opinion is not only an opinion, it is best to see the results, especially three operators to come up with practical plans and programs. "Consumers do not buy in the message of netizens, the reporter found that consumers are not enthusiastic about this." "I do not want fiber, let my ADSL full load on the line," 8M? Do you want me to sell blood?　　”...... Consumers ' dissatisfaction with fiber-optic networks is mainly focused on tariffs. The reporter learned that fiber-optic tariffs than ADSL to expensive, and generally bundled sales.　　In Wuhan, Shanghai and other place, the introduction of fiber-optic network packages are more than 200 yuan per month. The knife horse told reporters he was not worried that operators would raise internet tariffs. "After all, now is not an oligopoly, if the charges are outrageous, users do not recognize, who will pay?"　　"He believes that operators will develop more value-added services, to increase demand and other personalized requirements, thereby reducing network costs."　　But will someone pay for value-added services? Reporter last year interviewed a network of Guangzhou Telecom marketing staff, according to his introduction, to deal with the vast majority of users to handle the business of the telephone, IPTV and other value-added services to be revoked. And, the free trial of audio-visual services, Internet value-added services are also very few users to renew their fees. "The reason is simple, the phone needs a monthly fee, IPTV card can not see, those value-added services are more ' rubbish '." "In the 8M era, the internet is not a problem at least, but what consumers really want value-added services is what the operators need more brains."