Climate report fakes The United Nations encounters a credit crisis

United Nations climate Organization report citing unconfirmed data, the body's chairman acknowledged an error, but declined to apologise. The IPCC chairman, Pachauri, acknowledged the damage to the organization's reputation, but declined to apologise. An error report on the Himalaya Glacier Melt assessment has made the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) a target. January 20, the IPCC officially acknowledged that its 2007 Climate change fourth Assessment report of the major "mistakes", of which the Himalaya glaciers will disappear in 2035, the conclusion is seriously contrary to the facts.　　　　In an interview with British Media 3rd, IPCC chairman La Chen Della Pachori said the report had caused serious damage to the organization's reputation, but he declined to apologise for the wrong report. The chairman refused to apologise for the lack of evidence used in the IPCC article in 2007, a U.N. report explains the global warming of 7 continents and points out that "Himalaya glaciers are likely to disappear completely by 2035" if the planet continues to warm.　　This is considered the world's most authoritative climate report, from the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). In the 2035, this time frame caused worldwide unease. Since then, however, it has been found that no scientific literature has ever mentioned the findings, and only one Russian study has shown that the glacier will disappear in 2350.　　To that end, some have questioned the IPCC's mistakes in copying data. In the face of questioning, the IPCC said in a statement that the 2035-year forecast was only quoted in a New Scientist magazine article on Himalaya Iceberg.　　The author of the article, Indian scientist Saidi Hasnay in the media to admit that his article is only a "speculation", there is no formal investigation support, nor based on any research reports, but a scholar for a brief telephone interview after the gain. The revelations have made the IPCC the focus of public opinion, and the questioning of its authority is menacing.　　To that end, the agency's chairman, La Chen Della Pachori, received an interview with British media 3rd. "This mistake cost us dearly. There is no doubt about it, "Pachauri said." Everyone thinks the IPCC report is the gold standard and there is no mistake. "The wrong price also includes a demand for the chairman to step down," Pachauri responded positively ——— He declined to make a personal apology. He said he did not need to apologise for the IPCC's statement that it had made a mistake and that he was not responsible for the Asian part of the report. "You can't expect me personally to be responsible for every word in a 3000-page report."　　"he said.　　Mistakes can prevent experts from writing to point out errors in fact, this assessment of the impact of climate change on Himalaya glaciers did not invite any glacier scientists to attend. In an interview with Belgian media on February 1, the Vice-President of the IPCC, Pascal Van Ipperseeler, said that in assessing the impact of climate change on Himalaya glaciers,The group did not absorb glaciers.　　The report directly references the reference data, which results in the factual basis of the report is not solid. The IPCC had hoped to nip the mistake in the cradle. Van Ipperseeler said that in the final review phase of the assessment report, an Australian glacier scientists had written to the IPCC several times, pointing out the mistakes in the report.　　The IPCC experts who received the letter did not respond because they were not responsible for assessing the glacier part of the report. "Plagiarism and inertia shame us.　　"Van Ipperseeler said. Pachauri is of the view that the IPCC should be more rigorous in the application of the grey literature. The so-called "grey literature" refers to internal literature published by unpublished and statutory authorities, such as articles published by environmental organizations, companies and students. According to the regulation, the IPCC needs to conduct two audits of its credibility when citing such data. "But this time, we didn't strictly enforce the rules.　　"Pachauri said.　　　　The IPCC report is published every six years, and governments around the world make climate-related policies based on the report, which can be said to be global in their impact coverage.　　Scientists in academia have been questioned because of the report, the IPCC has shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Gore, but malfeasance and fraud face an unprecedented credibility crisis. There is also the entire climate of academia, the media has uncovered more climate fraud precedent. Last year, the e-mail system at the University of East Anglia in the UK was hacked into, and people questioned their research on climate change on the basis of several researchers ' emails, deliberately excluding some data to prove warming.　　The research center is the body that provides data for IPCC climate change reports. "What is the most untrustworthy profession in the world?" Lawyer？ A second-hand car merchant?　　In the last three months alone, a new world's least trusted career has been born ——— climate scientist, "The Washington Observer magazine commented. "Climate change sceptics", through the New York Times blog article, reiterated the assertion that global warming is a political pretext. The article points out, "people through such fake data and various climate summits to strengthen our false impression, but the global climate is not really warming?" How does this affect our lives? No one has ever really described it.　　"Previous scientists have pointed out that the impact of greenhouse gas emissions on the Earth's temperature rise can be negligible, the main reason for temperature rise is because the earth is now in an ice age, the temperature rise will continue to the Earth next ice period began, which is related to solar activity." The problem remains that climate change should not be overlooked. Pachauri, in an interview, wants people to come out of the debate and look at the issue in the long term, "the impact of climate change is compelling and extremely important from a big point of view." How can we ignore the impact of climate change on the planet? The Wall Street Journal Analysis said the IPCC's "climate gate" caused the uproar, the essential reason mayOr because the IPCC itself has unquestioned authority. Despite accusations, the IPCC still has supporters. "In this big debate, we can't forget that the world's glaciers are melting much faster than the IPCC had expected," says the U.S. authority for Science, a coalition of Concerned Scientists. A 2005 survey of 424 icebergs by the World Glacier Monitoring Agency showed that only 26 icebergs had increased ice thickness, and 398 icebergs had shrunk in height. This means that 90% of the world's glaciers are melting with global warming. "(Shiying)