Distracting thoughts: Product sensibility is higher than design rationality and operation of some new ideas

1. Some new ideas about operation
A few days ago I sorted out the operation functions of the content community and sorted out the following six points.

First, to safeguard community order. Through the Operation Personnel Management, Agent management, rule algorithm processing and other means to ensure that the quality of the positioning of the content (users) get more encouragement to the bad content (users) to suppress. In addition to content management, also includes the management of interactive order, user level management, content classification management.

Second, to provide users with more play. Through the means of activity organization, it can also open up new content modules, including providing browsing interaction with more topic dimension.

Third, the management of public relations. On behalf of the product, the official faces the user, maintains the Help system, answers the user feedback, establishes the good official image. When users are dissatisfied, ease their mood, as the middle layer to promote the solution of the problem. At the same time also need to establish a close relationship with the core users, priority to protect their interests.

Iv. update Management. On the one hand, the promotion of high-quality content to promote the user to browse, guide the content of the atmosphere, on the other hand also need to create an active community climate, to promote content Word-of-mouth content, such as user interviews, the essence of the topic.

Five, resource management. For user resources are mainly pull people, or special users to join the audit. For content resources, the main data collection and collation, set up a database to facilitate user inquiries.

VI, User boot. means or several of the above, such as activity organization and content production update, but the goal is to guide users to understand products, adapt to products, and simple to meet the user different.

In addition to the promotion, but I put the promotion to the market to promote that part to go, temporarily did not calculate to the operating side, which is the nature of our internal division of labor to determine.

These are all old tunes. What's the new idea? I used to not optimistic about the community to do the project, I think you and the channel to learn what to learn, but to the editor-in-chief of the editor to see Baogong means just. But it depends on the mentality. If you're going to do a project for Baogong, that's pointless. But if the mentality is to UGC the essence of the content, through the theme of this media packaging means to form a distinct content appeal, new and old users are very useful. He does not have to go to the community slowly, through the highlights of several topics can be suddenly touched by the product, leaving a good impression, of course, is a cost-effective business.

The same means, the two mentality, the result is very different. If your starting point is to facilitate users to impress users, produced content than "complete the task to impress the leadership" more reliable.

The latest version of the online, some people say no features, I think so. Initially think that this version is just a rough frame up, and then continue to add modules to the inside, the new module will be more distinctive. But the development of the new module needs a lot of time, even its effect can not be absolutely guaranteed. So through the form of a topic, the good content by the theme of the focus, with packaging and editing means to form an appeal, is not the fast characteristics of the shortcut?

It seems that the 4th is worth more attention and input. Of course, the premise is that content production can impress people, but in the media from my perspective, it is not difficult.

2, the product sensibility is higher than the design rationality
Recently issued a framework version, the function is fair, but the effect is mediocre. I'm more concerned with evaluations like "too thin" than "no special" criticism. I accept all kinds of criticism and find solutions. The problem that really makes me bury my head is that, in the diary, I can tell why I am stuck in the rigid mode of thinking and use the ice-cold product logic to consider.

Purely from the product logic, this version of the shortcomings are not much, and the changes before the revision is not large, mainly to achieve two of the merger of products, design in line with the basic user logic. But the user is not to tell you logic, he told you subjective feelings, subjectively think that after the revision is not rich, not lively, lack of human taste and community sense. A whole bunch of sentimental descriptions. When I heard the user say so, I looked back, sure enough, I felt the same way. Though the improvement is still in time, it can be adjusted over a month. But why would I make this mistake? Why can't I realize the user's feelings in advance?

Not only did I make mistakes, but more famous examples include Google Buzz. I in the previous log to grant him, the batch of plausible, spit star Splash to a metre high. Well, actually, I have a stupid time.

More ashamed of, I encountered problems, the operation team has long been found and early warning, but I did not care about, and he talked about how the product logic is reasonable, that the ultimate effect is not big. It is a pity that he is wrong to me. The result of too much logic is to install a mechanical brain that has no sense of sensibility.

We often say that product personnel to become their own typical users, it is not easy to do this, depending on the nature of personal interests and products of the natural relationship between. No interest, no talent, forcing him is not typical. And many users, I may be the primary level of the author, other planning colleagues may be ordinary viewers, planning the character is mostly introverted, very little initiative with users to make friends, far to enjoy, send a few comments. Deal with user feedback at most every day. So how do we perceive the feelings of other users, especially the core users?

In the past, I have organized the planning Operation Group and the senior guests of the friendship dinner, benefited a lot, but later because the work is too busy, did not adhere to, say a meal to get the information is also limited. Perhaps I have to admit, I also good planning group, because we are not photographic level, interest is not enthusiastic enough to fully understand the core audience is very difficult things. What about it? That depends on the judgment of the operating group.

As opposed to non-stop meetings, writing documents to do the prototype of the Planning Group, all the time and content to deal with, and users to deal with the operation Group, obviously better understand the user. They may not know what the product logic is, but they must know what a variety of users like and dislike, and what kind of emotional touch the user has for each product design. From the operation to assume the role of party A, to give more operation of the words of authority, than entirely by me and the planning group to determine the product plan more reliable.

For most products, the only way to the king, may be "user experience" so subjective, perceptual indicators. The purpose of rational design is to please the emotional pleasure, even a considerable part of the emotional pleasure can not be analyzed with the right common sense, must be in the complex user stories. So who knows more about the target user, and who's talking, I think it's reasonable. The pride of the product designers that derive from the so-called "professionalism" should converge.

3. General Yan, please.
A few days ago to see Jianchuan Weibo, he built a war museum in Sichuan, there are two parts of the national army and the Communist army. Countless people ran to persuade him, for the National Army to build museum outdated, not conducive to harmony and stability, to a major event. He didn't talk. At last the museum was built, and there was no social unrest and political change.

Similar to the situation from the 80 's beginning to calculate, but also include the granting of land contracts, open individual operations, the construction of Shenzhen Special Economic Zone, the trial of joint-stock, restructuring state-owned enterprises, accession to the WTO and so on. Every time there are countless people run out, can not apply the Western model, ah, not in line with China's national conditions ah, to adapt to local conditions, ah, imperialism ambitions ah, the state unrest people suffer ah.

As a result, everyone knows.

Now there is a call on the Internet to open more free speech (note, not absolute freedom), but not just the government, but even a large group of netizens have objected, saying that it is not in line with China's national conditions. "Inappropriate" Four words is very impressive, can almost cover anything, knock out any teeth. World of Warcraft has become a box, the national conditions, film subject subject to a lot of restrictions, or national conditions. What is the national situation? It is actually a roll of 3.5 yuan-dollar sealant, when and where all can be a paste to your mouth up.

In my mother's case, her ladyship has always objected to puppy love. I reasoned with her, said that this westerners are very young to fall in love, think that pure valuable, my mother said, Europe and America are Europe and the United States, our yellow-skinned oriental people do not look like that.

I said, separated, the Japanese also support from childhood love, also feel that innocence valuable, the law stipulates that girls can marry 16 years old-my mother said, Japan is Japan, we China has its own national conditions.

I said well, to talk about the national conditions. Before 49, 16-Year-old married in China is a normal. How old is Jia Baoyu? How old is Lin Daiyu? "Compose a love chapter". You say the national conditions, is 1949 years after the National Day, is our party's sentiment, is not the Chinese sentiment. Why is this 50-year party situation right? I think it is oneself in the world, rebellious ancestors.

My mother can not answer, anger and smoking me.

It seems difficult to reach a consensus on what the situation is. The only viable solution, as Deng said: Stones. China's 30 years of reform and opening-up, no exception is from the pilot began, cautious forward. This is similar to making products, and gradual attempts and positive improvement are the irrefutable of success. In China, who can clap their breasts to say that they have a thorough understanding of the "national conditions"? Most of them are in the well. Lack of sufficient experimental data support, at the beginning of the preset good "one how will be sure to do," both left and right are shaped with Gan Ging. Why swear.

The stability of any complex organism is to be stabilized in motion, as is the case with the day of grievances. Change does not mean radical, the slower you ride the more easily you fall to the ground. As a recent social research article has said, the more stable, the more unstable. The more afraid of change, the quicker the change comes.

In "The Siege of the Assassins", there is a master of the Qing dynasty called Chong. He has also received a new type of education, from the national conditions, insisting that the Chinese are only worthy of the Emperor's grace, and fearing foreign hostile forces died my heart is not dead, by its spokesperson "Revolutionary Party" succeed will unavoidably social unrest, the people misery, so vowed to kill the reverse thief Sun. Although for the film deduction, I believe that such people are quite a lot of that year. In fact, what is the difference between "those years" and "These Years"?

Want to understand this section, and then encounter political dissent will not bother to noisy, smiling said: General Yan, please return.

Source: http://firecacada.blog.163.com/blog/static/707437620103285221265/